SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting
An SI Board Since June 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
198267 1051 8 QCOM
Emcee:  Silcon Observer Type:  Moderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
198242GR8 , re: Rasgon ...............................................................Jim Mullens6Thursday
198241From the court documents I perused it seemed both parties were being chastised awaitwatchwander1Thursday
198240Your robot just lied to your face. None of this is true: Finalizing the "QCOM_HYPE_TRAIN2Thursday
198239QHT- reason for todays (Mar 26) teleconference. .............................Jim Mullens4Thursday
198238Yep, your robot is correct, but it missed WHY there was a conference - it seems QCOM_HYPE_TRAIN1Thursday
198237QHT- re: You folks can just ask me..........................................Jim Mullens-Thursday
198236Very true. Hence the reason for my cynicism. I do believe that EPS growth speakswowiehowie-Thursday
198235Probably foolish to take the analyst community commentary at their word. Are yofreefromwires1Thursday
198234If arm is going to make chips, why don't they just buy QCOM, they are alreadtomychagrin-Thursday
198233Excellent Jim, thanks for reporting on this. It is very strange to me that NONE wowiehowie1Thursday
198232Yes, I guess our “downside risk” continues to decrease along with the share pricmk511-Thursday
198231You folks can just ask me, I pull all the court documents and read them. I havenQCOM_HYPE_TRAIN2Thursday
198230Copilot >>>>Confirmed: March 26, 2026 Teleconference (10:00 AM ET) Jim Mullens1Thursday
198229QCOM v Arm - Judge Maryellen Noreika - reaction to being "misled"Jim Mullens7Thursday
198228matherandlowell -- Unless Qualcomm's licensing policies have changed dramatiArt Bechhoefer1Thursday
198227Revisit the timelines of both QCOM’s Nuvia – Oryon development and that of Arm dJim Mullens1Thursday
198226QHT -- Your points are well taken. This is a complicated, and often dirty businArt Bechhoefer-Thursday
198225I suspect some of Qualcomm's AI model compression memory reduction algorithmwaitwatchwander1Thursday
198224Arm Designs – what may have been copied from QCOM- Nuvia. .....................Jim Mullens3Thursday
198223It's expenses, especially non GAAP expenses. The failure is in earnings, nowaitwatchwander1Thursday
198222"Is ARM using any QCOM patents, legally or not?" Here's my questimatherandlowell-Thursday
198221Rasgon has been in the same boat as the rest of the analysts. It took him a lonwaitwatchwander1Thursday
198220> Let me put this in a different light. The majority of analysts are assumQCOM_HYPE_TRAIN1Thursday
198219PS. Happy Dividend Day! Anyone else not seen their dividend yet today? FirstMETMAN-Thursday
198218One of the (many) problems I have with leadership is their inability to communicQCOM_HYPE_TRAIN2Thursday
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):