SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Lucent Technologies (LU)
An SI Board Since May 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
21876 377 0 LU
Emcee:  MRE Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
19826Nortel CEO downplays 'junk' status By Jeffry Bartash 04/04/2002 11:55Softechie-4/4/2002
19825And Nortel said thing were good in 2000 right before it started warning...and wasylvester80-4/4/2002
19824The Moodys statement says NT will be in compliance with Qtr 1 bond covenants.Kenneth E. Phillipps-4/4/2002
19823*NT Nortel Networks ratings cut by Moody's (4.43 +0.08) Moody's lowerSoftechie-4/4/2002
19822Let me repeat: <i>congrats on the Moody's Nortel downgrade today. Nortsylvester80-4/4/2002
19821Last time I looked, Nortel is "up" for the day.Kenneth E. Phillipps-4/4/2002
19820I don't think Nortel will be in business in 5 years. Maybe that's what Osylvester80-4/4/2002
19819Ken, Soletron expects 2 <b>billion</b> in optical equipment sales frDiB-4/4/2002
19818<i>Dave, Optus is betting $35 million per year that Nortel will thrive durElroy-4/4/2002
19817Dave, Optus is betting $35 million per year that Nortel will thrive during the nKenneth E. Phillipps-4/4/2002
19816Ken, The deal is only worth $175m over 5 years.... Just a drop in the bucket.Dave-4/4/2002
19815For only just $175 million over >>five<< years? You have got to be jsylvester80-4/3/2002
19814Rock... bottom?David Hansen-4/3/2002
19813Nortel is gonna rock tomorrow. biz.yahoo.comKenneth E. Phillipps-4/3/2002
19812Actually with volume being the lowest in quite a while (we only had volume 25 misylvester80-4/3/2002
19811Due to the fact that there were more sellers than buyers today, LUCENT was down Anonymous-4/3/2002
19810From lightreading - Seems like an optical guerilla is throwing its weight aroundKenneth E. Phillipps-4/3/2002
19809Of the recent move up from 4.26 to 4.93: 50% fibonacci retracement is at 4.58 6sylvester80-4/3/2002
19808Chart Readers: LU is searching for support today and not finding it... Will we hDavid Hansen-4/3/2002
19807wow, what brilliance. Like I couldn't have told investors that!Dave-4/3/2002
19806Merrill says avoid optical networking stocks By Reuters staff 01 April 2002 Maelmatador-4/3/2002
19805<b>Lucent Technologies Raised to `Buy' at Banc of America</b> Isylvester80-4/3/2002
19804<b>Lucent Technologies and Tech Data Expand Distribution Agreement</b&gsylvester80-4/3/2002
19803nokia.com Focus on "Nokia Networks"Dave-4/3/2002
19802<b>WorldCom's MCI to Redeem Notes; says cash position improved during sylvester80-4/3/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News