SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
Coleville Resources - CLL
An SI Board Since August 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3058 6 0 CLL
Emcee:  Dave Warner Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1983 TWJ,I for one very much hope you are right. Others here are clearly of the opinKeith Donaghy-6/19/1997
1982 Hold up here boys.... On February 26 Coleveille announced that ANZ/CLL had forTWJ-6/19/1997
1981 Thanks for your reply, sorry if I am not jumping with joy that they are being &Keith Donaghy-6/18/1997
1980 John, You have been noticable by your absence. Your comments at this point woulKeith Donaghy-6/18/1997
1979 I have a friend that works for the ASE, and when I mentioned Coleville, lets juGoldfinger-6/18/1997
1978 Gerry, if this is true, that CLL is out of INDO, then your post included lies. Keith Donaghy-6/18/1997
1977 I will look into this for you Goldfinger. But I have found out one thing, all Mike-6/18/1997
1976 Does CLL still own shares in ANZ or were these taken backGoldfinger-6/18/1997
1975 I would like to ask the members of this thread a question. Would you pay 42 ceMike-6/18/1997
1974 Kencana were the owners and made the deal with cll a while ago. Then ANZ was bMike-6/18/1997
1973 John, I really don't think that CLL management cares, they already made milMike-6/18/1997
1972 Well all; Let's look at the CLL price action in the last two weeks and askJohn Veltheer-6/18/1997
1971 cll defaulted on something and the share goes back to the indo partner, somethijohn-6/18/1997
1970 I Have just been informed that coleville has in fact lost the whole deal. I conjohn-6/18/1997
1969 I don't read it that way....I thought kencana only owned 10% of the propertEric Eden-6/18/1997
1968 I believe coleville was in default and the rights went back to kencana thus it john-6/18/1997
1967 The release states ------"The latest advance was made pursuant to an agreeEric Eden-6/18/1997
1966 I read the release as folows: They talk about an agreement with respect to thejohn-6/18/1997
1965 it sounds like coleville is out BUT i am not sure, does not look good though. sjohn-6/18/1997
1964 my sources are reliable, i have found the timing to be off.john-6/18/1997
1963 Please explain your reasoning i see something quite differant, but maybe i am wjohn-6/18/1997
1962 I read that release to mean that the property is now 50% ANZ, 45% CLL and 5% KeEric Eden-6/18/1997
1961 If this is true and CLL is out of the Ojalali, then a class action suit is in Gari Rolfe-6/18/1997
1960 Ojolali contract of work filed AnLuc Beaugrand-6/18/1997
1959 Just received ANZ NR if I am reading this right it looks to me the CLL has nothGoldfinger-6/18/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News