SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Lucent Technologies (LU)
An SI Board Since May 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
21876 377 0 LU
Emcee:  MRE Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
19851I'm sure you mistyped your numbers. Consensus is for $3.5B not $4.5B which isylvester80-4/8/2002
19850Off Topic - It is interesting to speculate how a spike in oil prices could affecKenneth E. Phillipps-4/8/2002
19849David, you're numbers are old. IMHO, the best would be about 3.6-3.7b in revDiB-4/8/2002
19848LU is supposed to have revenues flat to up 10% from last quarter. That'd meElroy-4/8/2002
19847I'm not very surprised at the continued weakness we are seeing. I am more suDavid Hansen-4/8/2002
19846Interesting article on Cable & Wireless Message 17298434John Soileau-4/8/2002
19845Within 12 months IMO, Lucent is a double and more. JMHO.sylvester80-4/7/2002
19844Okay I have one question for all of you or one of you. How long are we fuc..ed tcd-4/6/2002
19843Unfortunately it is rocking in the wrong direction today. <i>" NorteJoe S Pack-4/5/2002
19842I hope not. For Lucent's shareholders, Lucent will do much better going at isylvester80-4/5/2002
19841"Alcatel could revisit merger talks with Lucent...says Neil Rickard, an anaelmatador-4/5/2002
19840It's a temporary shortage caused by the refineries switching to summer blendDavid Hansen-4/5/2002
19839Ha! Two peas in a pod I guess, you and I... I didn't read your response untiDavid Hansen-4/5/2002
19838No. I strongly disagree. The myth really is what the CLEC's had been callinDavid Hansen-4/5/2002
19837John Paquet is/was hillarious. Most likely, he lost his ass on Nortel being lonDave-4/5/2002
19836Anyone know the real reason that gasoline prices are rising? Is it a shortage oAnonymous-4/5/2002
19835Softie, I just posted an article that came out today and that also talks about tsylvester80-4/4/2002
19834Tell me why CLEC's have gone BK'ed? Wasn't it because of glut and noSoftechie-4/4/2002
19833<b>GLUT A MYTH?</b> biz.yahoo.com "A huge glut in the amount sylvester80-4/4/2002
19832Glut is not a myth...it's true! Why so many CLEC's have filed BK? Think Softechie-4/4/2002
19831Ah, it's mostly boring over there... Except when John Paquet goes on one of David Hansen-4/4/2002
19830<b>GLUT A MYTH? </b> Some analysts have even argued against the widDavid Hansen-4/4/2002
19829Lately, this board has been discussing NT more than LU. Maybe I should check ouEngineer-4/4/2002
19828You were right on the money... <vbg>sylvester80-4/4/2002
19827Nortel Networks (NT) bonds are unchanged after the Canadian telecom equipment maSoftechie-4/4/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News