SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Lucent Technologies (LU)
An SI Board Since May 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
21876 377 0 LU
Emcee:  MRE Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
19876Trades crossed on the Boston Exchange that day at $4.00. A couple of those tradGVTucker-4/9/2002
19875Actually it never hit that. Check the intraday chart and you will see. Stock wassylvester80-4/9/2002
19874The fact that it has been 3 weeks that LU has made its low while Nortel has beensylvester80-4/9/2002
19873You thought we hit 4.11. Actually on 3/26/02 we closed at 4.32 but got as low aAnonymous-4/9/2002
19872Holding this stock is like watching cancer eat your nose off. You might see whaAnonymous-4/9/2002
19871DiB, On your #1 - They are not cheering as much anymore. And for #2, absolutelysylvester80-4/9/2002
19870Couple observations: 1) imo the market is cheering Nortel because rather than iDiB-4/9/2002
19869Losses are losses no matter if they are 1 cent or 20 cents. You can't use thsylvester80-4/9/2002
19868To me LU looks so cheap down here that I just got my ST block trades back down hsylvester80-4/9/2002
19867NT lost .14/share. Will LU lose .15, .16 or .17?Kenneth E. Phillipps-4/9/2002
19866Yeah, but the thing is that LU is dropping alongside NT. Thus far, it looks likGVTucker-4/9/2002
19865I agree. I didn't know what to make of the Nortel rump job this morning. At sylvester80-4/9/2002
19864After this morning, I'm going to be slow to predict anything.David Hansen-4/9/2002
19863<b>DJ Nortel Estimate -3: In Line With Covenants At End Of 1Q</b> sylvester80-4/9/2002
19862<i>How far apart do these numbers need to be for you not to consider them sylvester80-4/9/2002
19861sylvester, RE: <i> Cause if Lucent does come with the expected $3.6-3.9 BGVTucker-4/9/2002
19860Nortel trading up 4% pre-market on the news.sylvester80-4/9/2002
19859With Nortel's $2.9 billion, that puts the recent Lucent guidance of "mosylvester80-4/9/2002
19858<b>Nortel Warns</b> We may hit a new low today because of this.... David Hansen-4/9/2002
19857I thought we hit 4.11 after the convertible offering?Dolfan-4/8/2002
19856that's incorrect. on march 20, I bought a few more shares at 4.29 in the eatcd-4/8/2002
19855Meanwhile ... back at the ranch ... LUCENT heads once more toward all time lows.Anonymous-4/8/2002
19854U R correct my friend...David Hansen-4/8/2002
19853I agree. I also think that Lucent managed this quarter. In other words I think tsylvester80-4/8/2002
19852sylv, imho any number above 3.6b in revenues will be fine. They may decide to deDiB-4/8/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):