SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks
Isonics Corp. ISON
An SI Board Since January 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1099 29 0 ISON
Emcee:  ilh1 Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
199 Paul, the higher charge carriers mobility in Si-28 epitaxial layers might be moZeev Hed-3/10/1998
198 Too bad this stock is getting clobbered like the rest in the "semiconductmajaman1978-3/10/1998
197 ISON may START by selling the standard wafers with Silc-28 layers now, which haMaster (Hijacked)-3/10/1998
196 Please do not be at too much haste to discount Zeev's observation. Read agPaul J. Sharga-3/10/1998
195 My view is that it is a good sign for someone to come and utter a great "fMaster (Hijacked)-3/9/1998
194 (off topic) Dear n2profit - while I understand Zeev's questionings may infuBosco-3/9/1998
193 n2profit, I am sorry, but you must be "reading challenged" in one wayZeev Hed-3/9/1998
192 Do you know about EVERYTHING and have NOTHING positive to say about any of the n2profit-3/9/1998
191 Zeev: You obviously know the processes for silc-28. Have you spoken with anyonmajaman1978-3/9/1998
190 Mark, I have checked the two patents from Yale. Fish and Richardson outdid themZeev Hed-3/9/1998
189 I would like to see how the company responds to your questions. They have the majaman1978-3/9/1998
188 Mark, I am not positive or negative on ISON at this point. I am weary of a compZeev Hed-3/9/1998
187 Keith, the doping with foreign atoms (boron, P and even oxygen) should derate tZeev Hed-3/9/1998
186 Apologize on the DBDY fiasco. Luckily I got out, too. Your posts intrigue me, majaman1978-3/9/1998
185 Mark, but I did, I told everyone to abandon ship on DBDY at $1.25 and never tolZeev Hed-3/9/1998
184 I am e-mailing Zeev's posts directly to the company. I would like to see thmajaman1978-3/9/1998
183 Owlbrit, note, they do say "growing isotopically pure ... ... epitaxial laZeev Hed-3/9/1998
182 Zeev, First of all, thanks for coming on board. We need a little help in underKeith-3/9/1998
181 Wow, too bad you didn't do this "through" analysis on the DBDY thmajaman1978-3/9/1998
180 Oops! I see what you're saying, now. They are stating an Si 28 layer on a s~Owl-3/9/1998
179 You wrote: <i>I doubt that "whole wafer" of Si-28 will ever be ~Owl-3/9/1998
178 Harbinger, thanks, I read these, and I am currently still underwhelmed on the SZeev Hed-3/8/1998
177 Keith, thanks for the patent numbers. I'll try and read the claims sometimeZeev Hed-3/8/1998
176 Zeev, The patent numbers are 5442191 and 5144409 One covers all semiconductor Keith-3/8/1998
175 Zeev..I'm not sure if you've read all of the information on the ISON siHarbinger007-3/8/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):