SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
CSGI ...READY FOR TAKE-OFF!
An SI Board Since January 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3391 10 0 CSGI
Emcee:  PETE DARRUDA Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1991 CSGI HAS A TOOLSET THAT WORKS. THEY HAVE 7 ALLIANCE PARTNERS WHO WILL BE GIVINtech-1/6/1998
1990 Humbly report, tech, regarding: "when I don't like something I don'Josef Svejk-1/6/1998
1989 THE FACTS: KEVIN HANSEN HAS LIED AND MISLEAD INVESTORS TO BELIEVE THAT CSGI WOtech-1/6/1998
1988 Joe, unlike you, when I don't like something I don't hesitate to say stech-1/6/1998
1987 CSGI seems to be downplaying the open investigation. Tech's very loud protTrader X-1/6/1998
1986 yup, that's what I expect to hear from someone as inexperienced as you. lotech-1/6/1998
1985 Humbly report, feltburner, ROFLMAO = rolling on floor laughing my ass off. I rJosef Svejk-1/6/1998
1984 ROFLMAO!?! A little help with this one? I'm a little slow on emoticons anfeltburner-1/6/1998
1983 Humbly report, tech, regarding: "yes, it is a slap, but a small one."Josef Svejk-1/6/1998
1982 CORRECTION, oh humble Technoid one. I never presumed to know what NASDAQ told Trader X-1/6/1998
1981 You don't think. I'm sure...it is a pretty coincidence that the stock Trader X-1/6/1998
1980 angel, do you care to explain why you LIED about calling NASDQ? Your own buddytech-1/6/1998
1979 yes, it is a slap, but a small one. I don't like it either, but I don&#tech-1/6/1998
1978 Mr. Tech Genius, can you please explain to me why you think <b>CSGI</bangel-1/6/1998
1977 Since you've repeatedly stated that ALYD's Reg. S offerings WERE a slapfeltburner-1/6/1998
1976 so, "genius" you think that since Ron Bishop re priced his options, ttech-1/6/1998
1975 Why, tech ... I do believe that your categorizing of the repricing of options aTEDennis-1/6/1998
1974 repricing options from $5.50 to $4.00 is a slap in the face as much as Bob Grudtech-1/6/1998
1973 <<They should be listed anytime within the next 45 days.>> unlike tech-1/6/1998
1972 Hey Genius, the price was at $6 when the options were revalued... DUH! <i&Trader X-1/6/1998
1971 Tech, Why are you wasting your time. You are clearly outmatched at every turnSE-1/6/1998
1970 Here's another factoid for the thread... tech: <<They should be listTrader X-1/6/1998
1969 TO ALL, TO ALL, AND TO ALL A GOOD NIGHT... Speaking of being exposd, did tech Trader X-1/6/1998
1968 I think the bigger question is why would CSGI slap shareholders in the face by feltburner-1/6/1998
1967 Jeff: Re: dyslexic ... Boy, that opened up a can of worms and some terrific onTEDennis-1/6/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News