SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
American Eco (ECGOF, ECX on Toronto exchange)
An SI Board Since April 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2841 13 0 ECX
Emcee:  david james Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1991 Did any one try to ask questions in the conference call that were not picked upWabash Cannonball-3/5/1998
1990 People are getting used to making a fast buck in the market lately. The investiWhySoSoon-3/5/1998
1989 >>>>>>Guess that takes care of my condescending critics<&lBruce Rogers-3/5/1998
1988 Dead money IMHO. MCGinnis sounded worse than KE on IOM's callFrederick Langford-3/5/1998
1987 my prediction: will defy conventional wisdom and finish on the plus side tomorHunter Vann-3/5/1998
1986 They actually missed by a lot more than 10% since the only quarter in question Bruce Rogers-3/5/1998
1985 wrong grommit.. q4 revenues 70.8 vs q3 48.17.. its the earnings that went downPeter H. Mack-3/5/1998
1984 <i>Hunter, They lied, how could you have known that?</i> I think hRaymond James Norris-3/5/1998
1983 OK, I'm looking over the press release again. The numbers are still impressNero-3/5/1998
1982 Hunter, I agree with you, I ignored it also, when the price started going up toJoe Hoek-3/5/1998
1981 Did Mike or anyone else come out and say specifically that American Eco will maHunter Vann-3/5/1998
1980 Finally Mike said Increased revenues by 89% Increased pre tax earnings by 142% david james-3/5/1998
1979 Lesson's learned with this one. Take the rose colored glasses off because tCarl Santavicca-3/5/1998
1978 Hunter, They lied, how could you have known that? and, FWIW, they had to have lFrederick Langford-3/5/1998
1977 Only the second question referring to the $1.20. Asking Mike what he thinks abodavid james-3/5/1998
1976 Just goes to show ya, smart money ALWAYS knows ahead of time. It was plainly wHunter Vann-3/5/1998
1975 <<how much lower can it go?!>> They missed by 10%. Stock down 10%Joe Hoek-3/5/1998
1974 How much lower can it go? Thats a question I never like to ask.....Anthony W-3/5/1998
1973 It sure tastes bad... they only made 1.08.. even at 10 3/4 the trailing PE is go_bucks-3/5/1998
1972 Ok--this is my last post for a while. We're now getting a lecture on taxesBruce Rogers-3/5/1998
1971 Coverage?? Must live up to expectations and be on time before any decent houseFrederick Langford-3/5/1998
1970 Oh no! In response to a question we were just told that they anticipate coveraBruce Rogers-3/5/1998
1969 Unbelievable! Poor results are partly due to fourth quarter "mobilizationBruce Rogers-3/5/1998
1968 You know full well that when the stock was at 12, the volume picked up and the Anthony W-3/5/1998
1967 Here we go - Norris explaining there was a delay in a couple contracts - and sodavid james-3/5/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News