COMS & the Ghost of USRX w/ other STUFF

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks
COMS & the Ghost of USRX w/ other STUFF

An SI Board Since June 1997

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
22053	33	0	COMS

Emcee: Scrapps	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
19978	Thanx. But let's keep in mind that COMS chugged ahead in response to my bei	Moonray	-	2/8/2000
19977	Yes and no. Most of my relatives are wired but they are strung out over the USA	Moonray	-	2/8/2000
19976	Welcome back. COMS is rallying in response.	jhild	-	2/8/2000
19975	The red ink continues to flow, albeit slowly. They -plan- to be a major player	David Lawrence	-	2/8/2000
19974	Good grief, man. We were scanning the obits, but no listings for a Mr. Moon, Ra	David Lawrence	-	2/8/2000
19973	**********REWARD CLAIMED******** Well, I suppose one could post to SI if o	Moonray	-	2/8/2000
19972	[Last Sighting] <i><b> Say, speaking of nailed to the cross, why do	Scrapps	-	2/8/2000
19971	**********REWARD******** <b>WANTED!! ALIVE... a person who is known	Scrapps	-	2/6/2000
19970	Now everyone is focusing on PALM. The remaining COMS is hard to figure out. Th	James Luk	-	2/5/2000
19969	Your point is well taken, however, I do think these things increase the pace of	Scrapps	-	2/4/2000
19968	That doesn't look like a dog that will hunt. It makes a good headline, but	jhild	-	2/4/2000
19967	Bell Companies Took $21 Billion in Improper Tax Deductions and Overcharged Cus	Scrapps	-	2/4/2000
19966	<i> Does anyone here besides me have the cajones to admit they still own	drmorgan	-	2/3/2000
19965	the question of COMS surviving and (dare i say) thriving without PALM will begi	mr.mark	-	2/3/2000
19964	Absolutely. <i>>>If it's going to go up...it's all in the	David Lawrence	-	2/3/2000
19963	If it's going to go up...it's all in the PALM action.	Scrapps	-	2/3/2000
19962	<i>>>Having this hit 80 would get a bigger grin on my face...</i	David Lawrence	-	2/3/2000
19961	Ok, I admit it. I'm a genius. Just like Eric. :-) [Rare smiley face] &l	DMaA	-	2/3/2000
19960	I'm here. Rejoice is not exactly on my mind though. I'm not unhappy by	jhild	-	2/3/2000
19959	Does anyone here besides me have the cajones to admit they still own their COMS	David Lawrence	-	2/3/2000
19958	<i>>>Probably end up sitting on my butt. Character is fate.</i&g	David Lawrence	-	2/2/2000
19957	I want it so bad I can taste it. Agonizing about the best way to get it though	DMaA	-	2/2/2000
19956	Yeah I'd like to get some. Would beat having COMS I think. <GG>	Scrapps	-	2/2/2000
19955	How's it going pal? You gonna to grab a piece of that Palm IPO?	DMaA	-	2/2/2000
19954	Palm's IPO ready to roll zdnet.com	Scrapps	-	2/2/2000

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):