SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Longer-Term Market Trends
An SI Board Since March 2008
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
3209 156 3
Emcee:  Fiscally Conservative Type:  Moderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2009SD "The jump in trades at the discount firm was retail panic and a move to SHAWING-11/15/2008
2008Totally the wrong take The jump in trades at the discount firm was retail panic SwampDogg211/15/2008
2007that's probably right but now we have ETF which make it easy like buy and horayrohn-11/14/2008
2006OT: IMO, shorting is still a mystery to 95% of the investing population. Buy astomper-11/14/2008
2005BC Remember the top in 2001? Highest number of trades per day on record, everyoSHAWING-11/14/2008
2004Thanks AA for the update. your call might have prevented a world of hurt for somNOW-11/14/2008
2003Last time I spoke of the miners was around 3rd week October, when I posited thatAllansAlias111/14/2008
2002This won't be a headline when we hit "the" bottom: <i>8:47APerspective-11/14/2008
2001I actually thought we were going to cave, but we rallied back into the supposed jjstingray-11/13/2008
2000NICE CALL!NOW-11/13/2008
1999Well, it is early yet and we can still cave here. I would not make any big betsjjstingray-11/13/2008
1998JJ This is shorter term but it looks like we are getting the E wave up. Here is rcksinc-11/13/2008
1997We are on the precipice here. A drop through yesterdays lows and I beleive we ajjstingray111/13/2008
1996Holy cow, just finished reviewing the NDX100 (I like to know what's under thPerspective-11/9/2008
1995<i>the indices are constantly rejiggered to reflect growth kinda like plaskinowski111/9/2008
1994but your other posts suggest that the indices are constantly rejiggered to reflemorokko65-11/8/2008
1993I guess one of the things I was trying to say, but didn't get across very wePerspective-11/8/2008
1992I keep a printout of this handy for perspective: the-privateer.com surely the morokko65-11/8/2008
1991bc great charts, paints a cheerful picture :). I thought IBM would have been a Logain Ablar-11/8/2008
1990Staring at these some more: [graphic] I am reminded that 1966-82 was a DEVASTAPerspective-11/8/2008
1989I am old enough to remember the 74-74 bear market quite well, and I can assure tstsimon111/8/2008
1988I think the most enlightening information I've gleaned from this experience Perspective-11/8/2008
1987Fascinating - I didn't realize that there was a tech bubble that burst in 19Perspective-11/8/2008
1986Here's a few more added to the chart: [graphic] `BCPerspective-11/8/2008
1985Yeah, you caught a flub. Dunno how I missed "T". But MMM was added in Perspective-11/8/2008
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):