SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
William Resources - WIM-TSE
An SI Board Since December 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1326 13 0 WIM
Emcee:  RH Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
201 To All : Just take a look at what WIM has done in the last year. They have goneM. Graves-5/7/1997
200 Hi Ed ! I have owned shares of WIM for about 7 months now and seen the share pRichard Nash-5/7/1997
199 ED why would you think Richard is not a shareholder. I am a shareholder and i fPACC-5/7/1997
198 Detailing the "1-3" consolidation: Well know, in 99% situation, any cEdward Y. Chang-5/7/1997
197 Well said Richard and Marcos. Just a comment on what Richard had mentioned abouPACC-5/6/1997
196 Anyone that doubts WIM ability to produce gold should sell their shares and stoRichard Nash-5/6/1997
195 Assuming you mean to use the past participle in your cryptic tag here, no, I marcos-5/6/1997
194 Your comparison to bre-x is garbage. WIM and BRE-X are not even close to similaPACC-5/6/1997
193 The consolidation plan will damage and eat our existing shareholders value. DonEdward Y. Chang-5/6/1997
192 Bev your probably right. I myself dont care to much for the idea and it soundedPACC-4/25/1997
191 I just received my notice for the annual meeting of WIM and article 6 says: TO Robert Blais-4/25/1997
190 RE: Consolidation Hello PACC and others, Regarding the argument that WIM manaCrocodile-4/25/1997
189 Yes, well, I guess the reason I missed the line about a consolidation here is tmarcos-4/24/1997
188 Through the conference call this idea was mentioned however it sounded as thougPACC-4/24/1997
187 Where have you and PACC heard about a consolidation? I would consider bailinmarcos-4/23/1997
186 marcos I never seen a consolidation that hasn't, at least initially, lowerLorne Larson-4/23/1997
185 Consolidations tend to lower the price, right? Are they considering this? If somarcos-4/23/1997
184 Well said marcos. Everyone remember that Williams gold production cost will be PACC-4/23/1997
183 And in two years, with demand on an upcurve and supply on a downslide, the POmarcos-4/23/1997
182 Bev and all. I too think this was a very wise move and it does show that williaPACC-4/23/1997
181 Gotta Like That.... Hi PACC and everyone on this thread, Thanks for the postinCrocodile-4/23/1997
180 Newsman wrote: > > -----------------------------------------------------PACC-4/22/1997
179 Im looking for better days ahead!!!! Take a look at the viking gold thread drilPACC-4/19/1997
178 That's better... Hello PACC and others... That's much better... Glad tCrocodile-4/18/1997
177 I dont think the release was the cause but maybe im wrong. Other than the POG iPACC-4/18/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):