Rockwell-Spins off Conexant (CNXT) | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks
Rockwell-Spins off Conexant (CNXT)

An SI Board Since January 1999

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
2013	83	0	CNXT

Emcee: jas244	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

A $1.2B leading supplier of chipsets and other products for the communications semiconductor market.

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
2013	Conexant and Sharp Launch World's Smallest and Lowest Power Wi-Fi Module biz	JakeStraw	-	3/8/2006
2012	Inasmuch as the reports I've seen on cnxt, though scanty, have been very pos	Mark O. Halverson	-	1/24/2006
2011	CNXT is now just in the middle of this: signonsandiego.com I believe in positive	masa	-	1/23/2006
2010	I.ve owned CNXT for a long time, but have given it total benign neglect until to	Mark O. Halverson	-	1/11/2006
2009	Hello every one, started this board( 7 )Seven years ago. WOW!!!! still kicking	jas244	-	11/29/2005
2008	Yes, we sure did have fun then. I'll never forget those days. Neat thread -	Carolyn	-	10/18/2005
2007	I'm good! You know...making lemons out of lemonade and staying out of troub	faqsnlojiks	-	10/18/2005
2006	LOLOL! Hey, how are you?	Carolyn	-	10/18/2005
2005	I'll take this grub, for this is the year, where is straight-life, ahhh..sh	faqsnlojiks	-	10/18/2005
2004	"See you in the 20's" Maybe, but not soon. 16:36 ET Conexant bea	Neil H	-	4/27/2004
2003	see ya in the 20s.	Brasco One	-	2/27/2004
2002	09:16 ET CNXT initiated at Pac Growth with an Over Weight rating 7.39: Pacific G	Neil H	-	2/27/2004
2001	Wake Up Thread - Hope your back is better! Press Release Source: Conexant Syst	Neil H	-	2/25/2004
2000	Nobody was banned because they disagreed with the general opinion. There was s	MeDroogies	-	9/18/2003
1999	>> The most obvious is that you can never know really someone’s position w	David W. Taylor	-	9/8/2003
1998	Well, that sets the entire scenario in perspective.	Bread Upon The Water	-	9/7/2003
1997	Technically David was never banned from a thread. The CNXT specific information	gpowell	-	9/5/2003
1996	IMHO, that is no reason to ban someone from a thread. You can always hit your i	Bread Upon The Water	-	8/29/2003
1995	It never does any good to repeat yourself to people who don't get it the fi	shoe	-	8/28/2003
1994	With all due respect, shoe, there were a ton of posters on the thread, who insis	David W. Taylor	-	8/28/2003
1993	I think the problem with David was that he kept saying the same thing over and o	shoe	-	8/27/2003
1992	David, I obviously don't know the gory details, but IF all you were doing w	Bread Upon The Water	-	8/24/2003
1991	Bill, The fun part is that I could not even post that same opinion on the other	David W. Taylor	-	8/23/2003
1990	IMHO, it is just plain wrong to ban someone from a thread just because they disa	Bread Upon The Water	-	8/23/2003
1989	I don't think you were overly optimistic to the point of not understanding t	gpowell	-	8/21/2003

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):