SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Vari-L (VARL)
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2702 34 0 VARLE
Emcee:  JakeStraw Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
202 PMFJI, but Annalena and I estimated 1997 earnings to be $0.36, broken down quarBadger-3/13/1997
201 Clark - thanks for the reference! This is excellent news. In my correspondence Badger-3/13/1997
200 Rob ... we all get that lonely, left out feeling of late. Many, if not most, sJames W. Bradsh-3/13/1997
199 At 10:15 the stock had still not opened for trading according to Yahoo. I callRob LeVine-3/12/1997
198 RL, I don't know where you got that info.? VARL is trading at around $10 1/JakeStraw-3/12/1997
197 Bill ... Bloomberg Personal. You have to be a magazine subscriber to get accesJames W. Bradsh-3/12/1997
196 Speaking of stock price...any idea why VARL isn't open for trading this morRob LeVine-3/12/1997
195 JWB, That would be great, wouldn't it!? Well 1996 came in at .30 so I'lJakeStraw-3/12/1997
194 JWB: All I have ever been able to find for a 1997 estimate is $0.45 from coverBill Marble-3/12/1997
193 J ... the tea leaf reader consensus for this year is .61 if it means anything aJames W. Bradsh-3/11/1997
192 EH, Thanks for the info. First Call says .07 and I'll say .08.JakeStraw-3/11/1997
191 According to Etrade's First Call, the estimate is 0.07. EricEric Hong-3/11/1997
190 CH, Historically VARL's 4th quarter always seems to be the strongest. I havJakeStraw-3/11/1997
189 General info - I talked to VARL IR today (actually their PR firm), and got someClarksterh-3/11/1997
188 Steve, I am extremely busy this week but I will try to post some highlights in jpginvest-3/11/1997
187 Regarding Quallcom/Vari-l relationship, I know back in 1996 when I left Vari-l,TEEPEE-3/11/1997
186 VARL's Annual Report and assorted written propaganda all list Qualcomm as aRob LeVine-3/11/1997
185 Badger - The reason that I said that VARL wasn't participating in GSM was tClarksterh-3/10/1997
184 Badger - Thanks for the info and list of VARL competitors, but I respectfully dClarksterh-3/10/1997
183 Where did you hear that VARL is not involved in Europe? In fact, one of the ComBadger-3/10/1997
182 I don't have any info on new designs at Vari-L, except a vague quote from oBadger-3/10/1997
181 Gweas - why do you think that they should have booked more than $6M in new ordeClarksterh-3/7/1997
180 Gweas ... that last sentence is ever so true! There are a number of competitorJames W. Bradsh-3/7/1997
179 Badger - Thanks for the info. One more question (a follow-up to the first set)Clarksterh-3/7/1997
178 Alright Badger, Finally some real meat. If there was one more message about cgweas-3/7/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News