Barringer technology (barr) | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks
Barringer technology (barr)

An SI Board Since July 1996

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
652	5	0	BARR

Emcee: shakeel vaid	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
202	Dave: first of all, if BARR was going to use the next quarter's numbers to	Sparky Beardslee	-	9/14/1997
201	Dave:...why does your buddy think BARR will do $.30-$.32 for next Q?...Est. is	Sparky Beardslee	-	9/13/1997
200	Hey Sparky, tell me how this sits with you, I was speaking with a fellow BARR l	dave niper	-	9/13/1997
199	Sparky; Mahalo for the clarification.Hope the scenario plays out similar to CEL	kit vanderspek	-	9/11/1997
198	Kit:...it has not been delayed, just taking a while. It can take anywhere from	Sparky Beardslee	-	9/11/1997
197	Sparky; I may not have been following closely.Do we know the secondary has been	kit vanderspek	-	9/9/1997
196	often there are 2 prospectuses- a red herring and a later - final one. This may	gonzongo	-	9/9/1997
195	Believe me, I have a prospectus!! Call 1-415-781-9700 and ask for yours. I call	dave niper	-	9/9/1997
194	Jim:...I am in the same boat, however, mgmt. is unable to comment and of course	Sparky Beardslee	-	9/9/1997
193	Dave;No one is questioning the potential here.The current social and political	raggs smith	-	9/9/1997
192	I've seen this before. Secondaries suck the stock down temporarily only to	dave niper	-	9/9/1997
191	sparky;I am becoming increasingly convinced that we have a serious problem with	raggs smith	-	9/8/1997
190	Dave:..This is distrubing as I was told just today that the prospectus has not	Sparky Beardslee	-	9/8/1997
189	Sparky, no doubt that this debacle sucks but it will pass. As to the prospectus	dave niper	-	9/8/1997
188	To all: we got our butts kicked today for sure. I guess no one likes to have	Sparky Beardslee	-	9/8/1997
187	Sparky;Thanks for the clarification. jim	raggs smith	-	9/6/1997
186	raggs:...30 day quiet period pertains to mgmt comments relative to price action	Sparky Beardslee	-	9/6/1997
185	Sparkey;Doesn't Friday's announcement violate the securities laws durin	raggs smith	-	9/6/1997
184	Jim:...Thanks....I am patient with this one. In fact my CPA has told me to hold	Sparky Beardslee	-	9/5/1997
183	Sparky Patience, I was in a stock named Mitcham Inds. (MIND) when they came o	Jim Langdon	-	9/5/1997
182	I hold 16,000 shs and control another 16,000 warrants, and after watching the t	Sparky Beardslee	-	9/5/1997
181	MURRAY HILL, N.J., Sept. 5 /PRNewswire/ -- Barringer Technologies Inc. (Nasdaq:	Jim Langdon	-	9/5/1997
180	Jim:...it does not....I was thinking of another. Wife just got out of hospita	Sparky Beardslee	-	9/5/1997
179	Sparky I am a novice investor and fail to see how a stock split raises capito	Jim Langdon	-	9/5/1997
178	stupid or not- The investment bankers wil make a ton of $. They want to depress	gonzongo	-	9/5/1997

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):