The Supreme Court, All Right or All Wrong? | Political Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics
The Supreme Court, All Right or All Wrong?

An SI Board Since July 2005

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans
3029	28	0

Emcee: sandintoes	Type: Moderated

Introduction Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
2029	<i>That's a fate that's actually too good for Democrats, but would	sandintoes	-	2/14/2007
2028	<B>February 12, 2007 Google Turns Over User IDs By Nicholas Carlson Go	sandintoes	-	2/14/2007
2027	In theory, the Judiciary is supposed to be non-political. Rather, apolitical.	Jim S	-	2/14/2007
2026	You would think they'd be free to speak their minds, but it's probably u	Tom Clarke	-	2/14/2007
2025	That's interesting. I wonder if there is some kind of code of ethics that p	ManyMoose	-	2/13/2007
2024	The only criticism justices <i>might</i> pay attention to are law re	Tom Clarke	-	2/13/2007
2023	I agree, split decisions aren't a bad thing. It's better to confront iss	Tom Clarke	-	2/13/2007
2022	Once again the treason debate has been slipped into the irrelevant trap of specu	CYBERKEN	-	2/12/2007
2021	I would hope so, but what does it take to at least investigate it?	sandintoes	-	2/12/2007
2020	The standard for any conviction, let alone one of treason, is much higher than	TimF	-	2/12/2007
2019	So no matter how many people read the papers of Teddy Kennedy wanting to side wi	sandintoes	-	2/12/2007
2018	Well the archives themselves could be admitted as evidence, or you could use t	TimF	-	2/12/2007
2017	Then how could we ever prove that what he did was against the USA?	sandintoes	-	2/12/2007
2016	Do you mean people reading the material from the archives and testifying? Yes	TimF	-	2/12/2007
2015	Do you think that would be considered "hearsay"? faculty.ncwc.edu	sandintoes	-	2/12/2007
2014	Well - "No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony	TimF	-	2/12/2007
2013	How about papers from Russia's archives? Would that be taken as evidence?	sandintoes	-	2/12/2007
2012	The criminal charge of treason requires an overt act witnessed by at least two	TimF	-	2/12/2007
2011	Today there is no treason, only people who hate the US and don't care who kn	sandintoes	-	2/10/2007
2010	I saw that, and I wondered to myself, what is the definition of treason anymore?	JDN	-	2/10/2007
2009	Did you hear about the papers that were released about Teddy Kennedy siding with	sandintoes	-	2/9/2007
2008	There are probably no perfect answers," she said. I'd say that sums up	JDN	-	2/9/2007
2007	<B>O'Connor: I Would Have Stayed on Supreme Court Sunday , February 04	sandintoes	-	2/8/2007
2006	I dont think that will happen (though means testing wouldnt surprise me), howeve	JDN	-	1/26/2007
2005	I fish but we dont catch salmon down here. Our best fish here is dolphin. jdn	JDN	-	1/26/2007

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):