SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Lucent Technologies (LU)
An SI Board Since May 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
21876 377 0 LU
Emcee:  MRE Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
20301After a low volume day yesterday, the volume has jumped back up and the trading Anonymous-6/18/2002
20300Bill O'Shea Chief technology officer and executive vice president of corporDavid Hansen-6/17/2002
20299Repost from another message board: Lehman Brothers on Lucent Technologies (LU Geoff Altman-6/17/2002
20298Thanks for the post. Here is the link for the article: lightreading.comsylvester80-6/15/2002
20297Will Lucent Win After Warning? -----------------------------------------------David Hansen-6/14/2002
20296I only hope you will still be here 12 months from now so that I can tell you thasylvester80-6/14/2002
20295Isn't Sprint one of the big Nortel customers? Don't look now but with tosylvester80-6/14/2002
20294That's one analyst's opinion, and he sure did damn with faint praise! ThJohn Soileau-6/14/2002
20293The sector sucks but Nortel has the edge over Lucent. nationalpost.com{372BED0BKenneth E. Phillipps-6/14/2002
20292elmat, fantasy world... or soon-to-be reality <g>: I've been calling tDiB-6/14/2002
20291elmat, what's your fascination with NEC?DiB-6/14/2002
20290I repeat: There will be only two telecom vendors for North America and this combelmatador-6/14/2002
20289Back on June 6 - - I posted - - <b><i>"Based on the most recentAnonymous-6/14/2002
20288OK, so the rumors were true...David Hansen-6/13/2002
20287And I was absolutely right... NT is down horribly since I made that comment.David Hansen-6/13/2002
20286I don't think so as the press release talks about the last quarter earnings sylvester80-6/13/2002
20285Agreed.sylvester80-6/13/2002
20284Close for LU was at $2.80 and in fact is trading even higher at 2.83 after hourssylvester80-6/13/2002
20283Sylv, that "sequential earnings improvement", will it be <b>primDiB-6/13/2002
20282Hey guys, does it occur to you that you're arguing about who's drowning Alex Chilton-6/13/2002
20281Your figures are wrong again. LU closed at 2.78 - down 5.8%. There was a lot of Kenneth E. Phillipps-6/13/2002
20280Hey Kenny, Nortel down more than Lucent today. And that's on top of yesterdasylvester80-6/13/2002
20279<i>Lucent almost even on the news while Nortel down 7%</i> My screenKenneth E. Phillipps-6/13/2002
20278The worst - Lucent's earnings report - is yet to come.Kenneth E. Phillipps-6/13/2002
20277<b>Positive Forbes article on Lucent's warning?</b> forbes.com sylvester80-6/13/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News