SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host
An SI Board Since December 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
42835 221 0
Emcee:  wooden ships Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 40 | Next 40 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
20522Actually I wasn't name calling (that time although I do return name calling geode00-3/6/2004
20521Larry, are you saying SI should look for more balance in its forums to discuss SKirk ©-3/6/2004
20520Kirk More balance means more posters. Hey! More postings means more readers for TREND1-3/6/2004
20519Richard Balance is the key to more postings.IMHO. And more posting means more moTREND1-3/6/2004
20518Dave, stop whining. You are beginning to sound like Bob Brinker did as Don Lane TREND1-3/6/2004
20517I heard that iHub bought SI, so I think we have to assume that the policies of SMath Junkie-3/6/2004
20516Larry If you want "balance"... as you claim: There is a Brinker foruKirk ©-3/6/2004
20515So why should a "new poster" risk being called a "hater" or TREND1-3/6/2004
20514Larry, stop whining. You are beginning to sound like Bob Brinker did as Don Lanstockalot-3/6/2004
20513Larry, I couldn't care less about "balance." I care about civilitySI Dave-3/6/2004
20512It is solely the harrassing/abusive nature of the posts that I take issue with, SI Dave-3/6/2004
20511Well Dave, you are not a Matt. A board needs balance. The anti-Brinker's havTREND1-3/6/2004
20510There was actually a fairly long list of times when Brinker advised switching toMath Junkie-3/6/2004
20509"There were changes to "buy" from "dollar cost average"Kirk ©-3/6/2004
20508"This is where I was surprised that Brinker didn't make a buy call. MayKirk ©-3/6/2004
20507"I do, however, take offense at commercial advertisements masquerading as pstockalot-3/6/2004
20506There were changes to "buy" from "dollar cost average" and bJ-L-S-3/6/2004
20505"I'd have to go back to see which ones made it into the newsletter becaJ-L-S-3/6/2004
20504"If you compare the initial drop in QQQ, the Rydex funds doubled while QQQ J-L-S-3/6/2004
20503Bob Brinker's Larry Dudash and Jerry Somer ignored! See how easy that is Lageode00-3/6/2004
20502Oh come on, people have called me all kinds of nasty names. I don't take chgeode00-3/6/2004
20501geode00 The Fate TempterSI Dave-3/6/2004
20500Names are absolutely necessary and I don't think you should slander Yahoo wigeode00-3/5/2004
20499"<i>So, if you just look at the long-term calls, there were only 3 thMath Junkie-3/5/2004
20498Is the name calling really necessary? This isn't Yahoo, you know.Math Junkie-3/5/2004
20497"All of those other calls were on record -- they were on the radio as well stockalot-3/5/2004
20496Mickie D's and Bob Brinker lying together! Thank you for reminding me, I hageode00-3/5/2004
20495<i>Bob Brinker and Martha Stewart this weekend.</i> Yes, Brinker haTim Bagwell-3/5/2004
20494<i>All of those other calls were on record </i> I'd have to go Tim Bagwell-3/5/2004
20493Bob Brinker and Martha Stewart this weekend. I don't know if Bill the Shillgeode00-3/5/2004
20492Jerry, thanks for the chart comparison. You can really see the momentum stuff goTim Bagwell-3/5/2004
20491Jerry shill is new around these here parts ain't he/she? Guess someone togeode00-3/5/2004
20490Bob Brinker: would even short the market Bob said time and again for, perhaps, geode00-3/5/2004
20489Brinker has <b>potfolios</b> according to shill Jerry. That would egeode00-3/5/2004
20488Bob Brinker is not Martha Stewart! Well, ok, he might dress up as her on Hallgeode00-3/5/2004
20487Bob Brinker doesn't understand stop loss or risk management! Bob did advisegeode00-3/5/2004
20486As much as Martha's reputation has been hurt, and the effect this has had onJ-L-S-3/5/2004
20485<i>It wasn't that she even did anything illegal originally but that shTim Bagwell-3/5/2004
20484All of those other calls were on record -- they were on the radio as well as beiJ-L-S-3/5/2004
20483"I vaguely remember reading somewhere that during the last bear market the J-L-S-3/5/2004
Previous 40 | Next 40 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):