SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
COMS & the Ghost of USRX w/ other STUFF
An SI Board Since June 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
22053 33 0 COMS
Emcee:  Scrapps Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
20528 Humm. Didn't think I'd get that confession so fast. <gg> One otScrapps-3/27/2000
20527 Well, of course THAT is true! <i>You can't just look at earnings.<Moonray-3/27/2000
20526 My, you have a long memory. "ratted out" is a little strong. I preferDavid Lawrence-3/27/2000
20525 So you're stirring it again huh? For your information I've only gottenScrapps-3/27/2000
20524 <i>"If he follows me, you can banish us both."</i> <bScrapps-3/27/2000
20523 Moonray: IMO, P/S used by ML is probably a better metric for an "infant&qDavid E. Taylor-3/27/2000
20522 You can't just look at earnings. If you take the value of the Palm holdingspeculatingvalue-3/27/2000
20521 Or, maybe they think that PER of 309 based upon May '01 earnings: corporateMoonray-3/27/2000
20520 Briefing.com wrote a piece on that phenomenon a while back. Seems they sometimeDMaA-3/27/2000
20519 Moonray: I wonder why ML's target is only 65 when Neff and Niles both haveDavid E. Taylor-3/27/2000
20518 I was wondering when you were going to get tired of that stuff. Lotta folks seeDMaA-3/27/2000
20517 RESEARCH ALERT-Merrill starts Palm NEW YORK, March 27 (Reuters) - Merrill LynMoonray-3/27/2000
20516 Scrapps: I can put up with a poke or two from you guys, especially when I ask David E. Taylor-3/27/2000
20515 David: I agree with your last comment. I wouldn't be at all surprised to David E. Taylor-3/27/2000
20514 David T, I lurk here and occasionally post. I held from USRX days till I recentTim McGee-3/27/2000
20513 Just show up...that is all you have to do. Oh...you have to put up with us too.Scrapps-3/27/2000
20512 Looking for fizz..... not fizzle.David Lawrence-3/26/2000
20511 I sincerely hope you won't be looking for the beer. <i> Agreed. IMoonray-3/26/2000
20510 Agreed. I'm looking for the pop in the next few days. I'll be gone by DDavid Lawrence-3/26/2000
20509 David: Having watched this for the last few weeks, I've got a feeling thatDavid E. Taylor-3/26/2000
20508 David, Your insight into the workings of COMS as an investment has been well David Lawrence-3/26/2000
20507 I post here and I don't/won't own it at this high price. <i>(1) Moonray-3/26/2000
20506 Jhild: Damn! Failing grade on the first point. But...I was in USRX for monthDavid E. Taylor-3/26/2000
20505 Is there another thread? But as to your inquiries, I think you have begun to gjhild-3/26/2000
20504 David and all: I'm thinking of abandoning the other thread and coming overDavid E. Taylor-3/26/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):