SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics
A Neutral Corner
An SI Board Since September 2005
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
2253 11 0
Emcee:  Constant Reader Type:  Moderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2053"Open-mindedness is vastly overrated; ...it mean[s] you never cared very stManyMoose-1/30/2006
2052<b>Sometimes one-sidedness is a function of bias and sometimes it's beMary Cluney-1/30/2006
2051 The legislature is Republican but it isn't dominated by extreme conservatiTimF-1/29/2006
2050<i>A basis of materialism requires that life had to have originated as a rIlaine-1/29/2006
2049I have no problem with anyone advocating the concept that science should not useBrumar89-1/29/2006
2048That particular piece wasn't "posted" on Wikipedia. Didn't thIlaine-1/28/2006
2047Marraige is just a gov't scam to sell marriage licenses, you say? There is Brumar89-1/28/2006
2046Everyone doesn't disagree with me. Only everyone who writes editorials and Brumar89-1/28/2006
2045I think that is a fair description. (BTW, apologies for forgetting that you are Constant Reader-1/28/2006
2044My point was much simpler than than. It seems to me that when everyone disagreeLane3-1/28/2006
2043<i>However, marriage has always been a legal institution.</i> ActuaConstant Reader-1/28/2006
2042"epistemological" is a nice powerful sounding word. It makes assumptiBrumar89-1/28/2006
2041Logically, you are right in seeing gay marriage, polygamy, group marriage as theBrumar89-1/28/2006
2040<i>How is it that science can be based on something that is not itself sciD. Long-1/28/2006
2039We can go round tha world and prove it isn't flat. We can't prove by exBrumar89-1/28/2006
2038Beyond the issue of ID, I don't think science has to be based on philosophicBrumar89-1/28/2006
2037<i>Very one-sided as I see it.</i> Sometimes one-sidedness is a funLane3-1/28/2006
2036Anyone can post anything on wiki they choose. Including opinions about the motiBrumar89-1/28/2006
2035Dear Ben: What an excellent response to this issue of gay marriage..The federalSuma-1/28/2006
2034I'm not talking about suppressing anything- and yes, there is harm in being epicure-1/27/2006
2033I was thinking of the Virginia state legislature and the Virginia state courts. Ilaine-1/27/2006
2032<i>The federal government shouldn't be in the business of marriage, eiD. Long-1/27/2006
2031 I could probably live with that. But I think the majority could not. PerhaTimF-1/27/2006
2030I see the concept of gay marriage and polygamous marriages to be different facetJorj X Mckie-1/27/2006
2029 I'm not sure I would call VA a very conservative state. Parts of it areTimF-1/27/2006
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):