SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING
An SI Board Since February 2002
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
21057 16 0
Emcee:  Peter Dierks Type:  Moderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
20582Look at all the times you posted to me, and I've deleted some of them beforeGROUND ZERO™-9/11/2002
20581Look at all the times you posted to me, and I've deleted some of them beforeGROUND ZERO™-9/11/2002
20580Kaczynski = left McVeigh = right E = complete moronGROUND ZERO™-9/11/2002
20579"Typical of a RePubeLiCon, someone always has to made the enemy... find anoasenna1-9/11/2002
20578Dear Filbert, What do think about ceiling fans?asenna1-9/11/2002
20577Dear Filbert, In future corespondence, would you prefer being addressed as &quoasenna1-9/11/2002
20576E I saw that GZ spam all over SI tonight. I read the RD post once - and I thinKid Rock-9/11/2002
20575LOL!!! Shameless b**ch! Tell you what: If you show up, I'll let him pummeLazarus_Long-9/11/2002
20574It's hard to be good at producing a non-existent threat, but I'll be mosE-9/11/2002
20573If Jill were still around, you'd be history, you know that, right? Now geLazarus_Long-9/11/2002
20572The "interpretation" that I'm engaging in is in making the assumptE-9/11/2002
20571richie is a nutcase. Not as bad as Duray, but still nuts. <i> It's tLazarus_Long-9/11/2002
20570Of course not. It's a paranoid rant. And it's scurrilous. But it's nE-9/11/2002
20569There was no explicit bomb threat. For that reason, I doubt the law can do anytLazarus_Long-9/11/2002
20568Calm down, GZ. Please.Lazarus_Long-9/11/2002
20567<i>The same could have been said about McVeigh or Kazinsky, don't undeE-9/11/2002
20566You are looking pathetic, I'm afraid. I'll do you a favor, poor baby. HE-9/10/2002
20565"Kept in check" with facts, or with lies? Ordinarily, truth is considE-9/10/2002
20564Yeah, yeah, yeah... it's amazing how you can deny it... now put down the bGROUND ZERO™-9/10/2002
20563It's hard to find something that doesn't exist, isn't it?! And kindE-9/10/2002
20562The same could have been said about McVeigh or Kazinsky, don't underestimateGROUND ZERO™-9/10/2002
20561I thought I told you to go back to your trailer park... find it yourself, this GROUND ZERO™-9/10/2002
20560Typical of a Dummycrat, someone always has to do your work for you... find it yoGROUND ZERO™-9/10/2002
20559Show me the bomb threat. Post it here. Bold the part that contains the threat.E-9/10/2002
20558SHOW ME THE BOMB THREAT! You have a reading comprehension problem. A serious onE-9/10/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):