SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
KEMET Corp.
An SI Board Since June 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
906 12 0 KEME
Emcee:  techtonicbull Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
206Doc, Encouraged by the NAZ holding 4100, so far. Not only that, but my favoritSJS-7/21/2000
205Steve, that last trade that pushed the close up to 29 1/4 was for 100 or 200 shadrsvelte-7/21/2000
204Tech.... (on ERICY): Shortages, Shortages, Shortages!! _______ LM Ericsson (ERISJS-7/21/2000
203Thanks tech, you should include yourself in the quality post category. Do youSJS-7/21/2000
202If you have followed SUNW as I have, the stock was selling in the 80's a coutechtonicbull-7/21/2000
201Tech, I don't. I know so many people buying this stock based on all they&#SJS-7/21/2000
200I can't understand why they are so negative on KEM. Maybe the news at Ericsstechtonicbull-7/21/2000
199Doc, I wasn't following those, so I can't correlate the action all thatSJS-7/20/2000
198The volume of the July 35 poots was also 2000 today. I'm not sophisticated drsvelte-7/20/2000
197The only way to be absolutely sure is to have the bid and ask values at the sameSJS-7/20/2000
196i understand your conclusion. thanks for the heads up,,,it was an excellent obsewlheatmoon-7/20/2000
195The way KEM was trading, I believe that that was the ASK price, hence......a buySJS-7/20/2000
194could someone have sold them?wlheatmoon-7/20/2000
193Tech/all, Please note that someone (high probability) BOUGHT over 2000 KEM AuguSJS-7/20/2000
192It's peculiar how AG means more to a cyclical stock like KEM than others, butechtonicbull-7/20/2000
191Tech, doing fine so far today. Low volume though. Everyone waiting for AG. SSJS-7/20/2000
190Steve: At least we started the day up 7/16. Wowee. Woopidoo! Let's see if ttechtonicbull-7/20/2000
189I'm encouraged, but let's see the darn stock do better. It feels like ittechtonicbull-7/19/2000
188from Thurs WSJ: Heard in the Southeast: Will Components Makers End Ride On RollCzechsinthemail-7/19/2000
187Well, Baird, KEM ended strong only down 3/8. After several rotten weeks, I did stechtonicbull-7/18/2000
186Hey doc. I've you and Mike and others buying this now! Wonderful company! SJS-7/18/2000
185drsvelt: wait 'till the big boys get a hold of these stocks. I have been saytechtonicbull-7/18/2000
184Baird: Let's see where it ends up. I like that post about AVX and KEM doublitechtonicbull-7/18/2000
183We are on our way. Maybe we shook off the bogeyman short sellers.techtonicbull-7/18/2000
182DLJ comment on AVX... AVX CORPORATION (AVX: $28.5)#+ 7/14/00 Demand Continuedrsvelte-7/18/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News