SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
InfoSpace.com
An SI Board Since December 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3070 69 0 INSP
Emcee:  Goldbug Guru Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2070the root of the problem is whether you think INSP will own the whole field for iSpytrdr-8/3/2000
2069the root of the problem is whether you think INSP will own the whole field for iSpytrdr-8/3/2000
2068Levy, << David the only negatives I know of are that people are not signiDavid Howe-8/3/2000
2067<i>(1) Naveen sold more stock today</i> Surely this was stated withHawkmoon-8/3/2000
2066David the only negatives I know of are that people are not signing up for these levy-8/3/2000
2065Kis, did you know this? (1) Naveen sold more stock today (2) William Harmond solH James Morris-8/3/2000
2064More questions for the bears, Now let's move from the wireless internet maDavid Howe-8/3/2000
2063A few questions for the bears on this board. Help me understand your position. David Howe-8/3/2000
2062Hey Mr keepitsimple did you made the news a while back aolpf.marketwatch.comlevy-8/3/2000
2061Could you point me to an article where the author has proof and can substantiatetrouthead-8/2/2000
2060how about some hard core facts.....I know about the hoover thing and the group levy-8/2/2000
2059>We value your long term short knowledge of the evil Dr Jain. Evil is a subKeepItSimple-8/1/2000
2058The current INSP share price is mostly a function of market psychology, IMO. ThDavid Howe-8/1/2000
2057OH MY GOD!! now since we are at it, let's assume that INSP, after grabbing 1Spytrdr-8/1/2000
2056No...I know that...didn't mean that you were... My apologies if I gave you playavermont-8/1/2000
2055Lets just say that AT&T, Verizon, etc. etc..... are just now in the past couplayavermont-8/1/2000
2054I'm not quibbling with you. jbtrouthead-8/1/2000
2053Ah. Thanks for the clarification. That sounds like a more resonable deal. Perhtrouthead-8/1/2000
2052This is how I phrased it yesterday... Note the last couple of lines where I saiplayavermont-8/1/2000
2051No...that is not what I said... IF the customer OPS for the wireless internet aplayavermont-8/1/2000
2050So if Verizon has 1000 customers they are going to pay INSP 2 bucks a month justtrouthead-8/1/2000
2049The 2 bucks a month is the fee...as I understand it...that the various wireless playavermont-8/1/2000
2048What do I get for my 2 bucks a month? jbtrouthead-8/1/2000
2047I made the following comments... <<That would mean total market of 250,00playavermont-8/1/2000
2046junior I could not possibly live without my cellphone but I am with you on not slevy-8/1/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News