SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
Business Wire Falls for April Fools Prank, Sues FBNers
An SI Board Since April 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
3795 39 0
Emcee:  EL KABONG!!! Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2070 Ckeeky Kid, I don't know about SI but TLC might have cause for a filing a Tom C-5/5/1999
2069 So I guess SI could sue me for this: unicusCheeky Kid-5/5/1999
2068 <i>So vast is art, so narrow human wit.</i> --Pope. Josef Svejk-5/5/1999
2067 Cindy, you're wrong. Sorry, but you are. You said you are not trying to bDon Pueblo-5/5/1999
2066 Perplexing, perhaps. But funny? Never. You can get sued for that. RocketMan-5/5/1999
2065 <i>"I am definitely not humorless, ask my friends, and my family, aMama Bear-5/5/1999
2064 I can be sensitive any time....but <i>quadruples</i> are hard to coBlue On Black-5/5/1999
2063 A perplexing, and (perhaps inadvertantly funny) message. The recipient might jJanice Shell-5/5/1999
2062 <i> I'm a sensitive type guy after all.</i> Where was the sensjbIII-5/5/1999
2061 You're so right. Does this help? greetings.xoom.comRocketMan-5/5/1999
2060 Y'all cut it out...I'm getting tears in my beer. I'm a sensitive tyBlue On Black-5/5/1999
2059 Yes, my honey, but one CAN be too "insensitive." Cindy Powell-5/5/1999
2058 Yes, and perhaps BW might appreciate "Wash That Dame Out!" Inside VeRocketMan-5/5/1999
2057 Oh! Taht's so Sensitive! I especially like the "I Just Read About ItJanice Shell-5/5/1999
2056 I guess all that guff about Liberté and Equalité and the Rights of Mamarcos-5/5/1999
2055 <i>Now why do you think that is? A serious question: I'd really like Janice Shell-5/5/1999
2054 <i>but instead writing your attacks based on full mastery of the facts—thJanice Shell-5/5/1999
2053 I didn't say that they should be sued as you are implying. I said that I caCindy Powell-5/5/1999
2052 <shrug> Shucks&#151all I know is what I read in the papers. <gg>Bill Ulrich-5/5/1999
2051 <i>Bizwire has suffered "heartache"? Oh gimme a BREAK, Cindy. TRocketMan-5/5/1999
2050 Bill,Bill,Bill.... You are catching on <gggg>. I think it is very objecBlue On Black-5/5/1999
2049 <i>My opinion is that they are glossing over the entirety of the situatioJanice Shell-5/5/1999
2048 Neither one. Just congratulating you on your ability to peer in to the facts ofBill Ulrich-5/5/1999
2047 Please, that's a cop out. If you think they (Webnode3) are in the wrong anmc-5/5/1999
2046 We can beat around the bushes, we can get down to the mall, we can leave it inmarcos-5/5/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):