SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host
An SI Board Since December 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
42835 221 0
Emcee:  wooden ships Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 40 | Next 40 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
20722stockalot That is my point. You just bitch about Bob Brinker, but give no alternTREND1-3/14/2004
20721"Comment: (1)Has Stockalot's advice made money. NO" What advice hstockalot-3/14/2004
20720Stockalot you wrote So you have people like the guy on yahoo who know the truth TREND1-3/14/2004
20719Sorry Larry, I don't bother with your silly site after seeing what it was. stockalot-3/14/2004
20718stockalot As shown on this IHUB Board below, Bob Brinker is "no good" TREND1-3/14/2004
20717Bob seemed to pick this company in the semi industry based on the exec's wilstockalot-3/14/2004
20716How do we pick the SEMI stocks to trade? We could start by picking them from theTREND1-3/14/2004
20715Sure Larry, I guess you have been spending too much time typing to yourself or rstockalot-3/14/2004
20714Stockalot you wrote "Brinker's second chance on the basis of the weakneTREND1-3/14/2004
20713Jerry, that is soooo Brinkeresque. Let's review. You claimed a bull markstockalot-3/14/2004
20712"As for requiring confirmation to signal a trend change, that is like sayinJ-L-S-3/13/2004
20711"You seem to have problems with people who don't agree with you." J-L-S-3/13/2004
20710Your answers prove why Brinker is so successful selling his schlock to a gulliblKirk ©-3/13/2004
20709<I>Do your own homework, slacker. Is this how you made it through school? Kirk ©-3/13/2004
20708You seem to have problems with people who don't agree with you. I'd sugKirk ©-3/13/2004
20707Do your own homework, slacker. Is this how you made it through school? You seeJ-L-S-3/13/2004
20706"I disagree. You are talking about TECHNICAL ANALYSIS where technicians argJ-L-S-3/13/2004
20705Kirk: "Did he tell his radio audience to DCA, wait for weakness or lump sumKirk ©-3/13/2004
20704I disagree. You are talking about TECHNICAL ANALYSIS where technicians argue ovKirk ©-3/13/2004
20703"can someone fill me in on UTEK " Sure be happy to Truthseeker. Sincstockalot-3/13/2004
20702What do you want to know? Brinker's past recommendations, or the companyJ-L-S-3/13/2004
20701"Did he tell his radio audience to DCA, wait for weakness or lump sum in?&qJ-L-S-3/13/2004
20700Well Kirk, I'm glad you asked. Your wish will come true. I hope everyone rJ-L-S-3/13/2004
20699I think I'm going to be sick....yep....'scuse me. They got Martha, whatgeode00-3/13/2004
20698As most of you know, Bob Brinker celebrated his 18th Anniversary broadcast this davidk555-3/12/2004
20697Elaine Garzarelli said November 2002.geode00-3/12/2004
20696can someone fill me in on UTEKStockDung-3/12/2004
20695<I> If you are going to fairly analyze Bob, then you have to use all his cKirk ©-3/12/2004
20694VTI <I>Thinking people generally use the S&P500, since it is a broaderKirk ©-3/12/2004
20693Brinker's call on 11-Mar-04 was a buy, not a DCA. We all know how DCA worksJ-L-S-3/12/2004
20692Interpreting Jerry's Brinkereze He wants you to believe that the bottom of stockalot-3/12/2004
20691Please try to me more clever than to re-use my insults.J-L-S-3/12/2004
20690You were obviously trying, in your table, to analyze Bob's DCA recommendatioJ-L-S-3/12/2004
20689"I am using October 2002 as the beginning of the bull market not March 2003J-L-S-3/12/2004
20688Jerry uses Brinkereze Jerry first dishonestly made a claim that the QQQ call whstockalot-3/12/2004
20687Here is DCA table corrected for equal dollar weighting but the result is about tTim Bagwell-3/12/2004
20686"Your personal attack is not appreciated and noted." Half right. YouJ-L-S-3/12/2004
20685"Most of the time I write only out-of-the-money calls, but anyway, many peoJ-L-S-3/12/2004
20684Sorry, I only put the mirror in front of your face.J-L-S-3/12/2004
20683Geeze, you do not understand DCA? And you act arrogant and condescending towardsYogizuna-3/12/2004
Previous 40 | Next 40 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News