SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
SI Beta Site Launch - 7/01/99
An SI Board Since July 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
2340 25 0
Emcee:  David Lawrence Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2090 Michael: It's done. Check out the Home Page, bottom left. Thanks, BryanBryanB-9/20/1999
2089 Multiple messages at the same time, w/o deleting all of them or havign to realoSir Auric Goldfinger-9/20/1999
2088 well you certainly don't owe <i>me</i> an apology. i'm notmr.mark-9/20/1999
2087 Michael: <i>"In the extremely rare and unlikely event that the new BryanB-9/20/1999
2086 mr. mark, I certainly did not intend for it to be condescending, although uponBryanB-9/20/1999
2085 Bryan, off the top of my head, my suggestion would be to put a link at the bottgreenspirit-9/20/1999
2084 <i>"I am worried about confusing new members who have never had the mr.mark-9/20/1999
2083 Cisco: In fact, we have already been in contact with the SEC regarding this maBryanB-9/20/1999
2082 Carolyn, I'm not sure what you mean by the "admin tools", but I BryanB-9/20/1999
2081 Michael, You are partially correct - I'm reading it on Sunday, not Monday.BryanB-9/20/1999
2080 Cisco (and August): It is not that I don't want to answer your question. BryanB-9/20/1999
2079 Auric, We've got a "remove" link already - next to each message BryanB-9/20/1999
2078 I bookmarked my "bookmarks" techstocks.com and clicked on that whenCheeky Kid-9/19/1999
2077 Big thanks to you and AugustWest for getting me back to the Classic SI. What aAnn Bradley-9/19/1999
2076 True, but a look at recent posts indicates a spammer. The rumors? Well, thatCarolyn-9/19/1999
2075 <i>But, if the member doesn't care, nothing can be done. At least theCisco-9/19/1999
2074 Agree, the profile problem has got to be fixed. But, if the member doesn't Carolyn-9/19/1999
2073 Good morning Carolyn, That day is soon at hand: Message 11233973 I wonder hoCisco-9/19/1999
2072 Carolyn, agreed, and that's when they should remove the link to the old Stogreenspirit-9/19/1999
2071 As soon as the admin tools are written for the new site, Classic is no more.Carolyn-9/19/1999
2070 This should suffice, Bryan will probably read this thread on Monday and make a greenspirit-9/19/1999
2069 <i>We need a link back to classic SI on the new SI homepage.</i> ACisco-9/19/1999
2068 The problem as I see it is that people on Classic are posting links to comparisCisco-9/19/1999
2067 Cisco, you can do comparison charts in New I. BryanB addressed this issue in thCarolyn-9/19/1999
2066 Cisco, res-<i> What I meant was that once you are in the New SI, you can&greenspirit-9/19/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):