SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Westell WSTL
An SI Board Since February 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
21342 87 0 WSTL
Emcee:  Jim Tao Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
20967Scotsman, You overall theory is sound but you have to pick the right "equiMark[ox5]-10/20/2000
20966Being new here, it seems to me that the bottom line is that the telecoms simply Scotsman-10/20/2000
20965S&M is aggressive because they are 1) international <offices in AmsterdamMark[ox5]-10/20/2000
20964Actually I did not make the "right call" on the quarter for WSTL... i Mark[ox5]-10/20/2000
20963Mark, they stated $85-90M total for the Q. That was on the call, OK? That'I. N. Vester-10/20/2000
20962Eddie Sometimes we need to seperate the co. from the stock. EFNT has done everMark[ox5]-10/20/2000
20961I was going to comment on this EFNT stmt... but laid off, you did a good job, bP314159d-10/20/2000
20960Thanks for the clarification, Mark. Haven't pulled up the EFNT financials yeRich Wolf-10/20/2000
20959Mark, you are correct that interest expense needs to be added back to the EFNT nELH1006-10/20/2000
20958when that becomes .17... I'll get it! DuhP314159d-10/20/2000
20957Can you say 2 bucks? I say lessP314159d-10/20/2000
20956I disagree. If volume keeps up like this, you are witnessing shorts garnering aP314159d-10/20/2000
20955Let me get this straight; Bruce A. told you WSTL is going to target only $30M CPMark[ox5]-10/20/2000
20954Rich i spoke to wstl IR guy, Bruce Albelda. i chewed him out really good about tI. N. Vester-10/20/2000
20953A little late? Really? I thought the best percentage gain shorting just began!P314159d-10/20/2000
20952That was not the "truth"Mark[ox5]-10/20/2000
20951Eddie You are missing something, you stated <i>First of all, EFNT's nMark[ox5]-10/20/2000
20950Ditto John, I was happy to take 6.5 for all of my IRA shares today, lucky (unlucmike cobble-10/20/2000
20949Today was the first day in over 3 1/2 years that I am NO longer a WSTL shareholdSkiawal-10/19/2000
20948One thing I don't understand (among many actually) is the charge due to the DBrian-10/19/2000
20947Rich, Good points. Because Westell really has not provided good and reliable iCzechsinthemail-10/19/2000
20946Eddie, thanks for the slap upside the head about the 'truth' behind EFNTRich Wolf-10/19/2000
20945Mark, I just took a look at EFNT's report for the quarter and a couple of itELH1006-10/19/2000
20944rich your right on all accounts seems like wstl was an interim supplier when efnmarc friedman-10/19/2000
20943I will give you this .. Auric... You made a Very Good Call .. Now .. If you wGalirayo-10/19/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):