SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
Stock-Picking Challenge
An SI Board Since January 2001
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
2402 53 0
Emcee:  Scott Lux Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2102Give TIGI time....that will probably happen next.Susie924-2/16/2001
2101Cousin Baldy, that's the way this contest is. If your high priced stocks go Bald Eagle-2/16/2001
2100Hi, it could be worse, one of my picks (COVD) has been halted!Bald Eagle-2/16/2001
2099ouch!Susie924-2/16/2001
2098You should have put TIGI in your portfolio :-)Bald Eagle-2/16/2001
2097<<John J. O'Reilly 22.91% >> his one stock that goes up almost Bald Man from Mars-2/16/2001
2096looks like the battle is for the Trophy........................ My <i>minuBishopsChild-2/16/2001
2095Here are the top winners and losers as of 2/16/01. I also included the link at tScott Lux-2/16/2001
2094Have you received an answer yet? You had asked the same question a day or two aSouze-2/16/2001
2093Loren, I have no problem with the flaws in the contest. They made mistakes, and Jon Tara-2/16/2001
2092I see the flaws in this contest like everyone else. But what is the big deal? Loren S.-2/16/2001
2091Dale, I used 7272 so the cost of both portfolio would be the same. This allows Skip Miller-2/16/2001
2090<i>why you used 7,272 dollars though? Why not 10,000 or 500 for that matteKZAP-2/15/2001
2089Thanks Skip, I'm curious as to why you used 7,272 dollars though? Why not 1Dale-2/15/2001
2088KZAP: Oh, I think you mean: 1. A contest that is clear to everyone and that dcanuck-l-head-2/15/2001
2087Scott: I could dispute the so-called "Official Rules" on the basis thcanuck-l-head-2/15/2001
2086<b>Exactly</b> canuck-I-head! Thus the suggestion for two contests. KZAP-2/15/2001
2085KZAP: Sorry, I don't get your point...? (I sense FRUSTRATION, but I doncanuck-l-head-2/15/2001
2084No, Doppler, you are wrong. You are twisting semantics to your own liking. MakeJon Tara-2/15/2001
2083<i>I was beginning to lose all respect for this contest.</i> ReallyKZAP-2/15/2001
2082Jon- you are right. My suggestion is a portfolio picking contest. It is also a sDoppler-2/15/2001
2081Why doesn't SI have the guts to come out and say <b>Hey! We made a misKZAP-2/15/2001
2080Scott, seems you're missing some entries. With the 2 mentioned in the prior Oeconomicus-2/15/2001
2079Was I disqualified? siliconinvestor.com And what about TD? siliconinvestor.comTim McCormick-2/15/2001
2078Top Overall Gainers User Portfolio Overall Percent Change John J. O`ReScott Lux-2/15/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News