SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Employee Stock Options - NQSOs & ISOs
An SI Board Since June 2002
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
786 22 0
Emcee:  rkral Type:  Moderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromPosted
211Huey, thanks for the article. Agree that it is excellent. Seems Paul Pacter is rkral8/18/2002
210Hi Ron: Here is an excellent article that was published in the CPA Journal by ahueyone8/18/2002
209Here is an article from Business Week titled "Pinning Down a Stock Option&#hueyone8/18/2002
208An Aug 7 article re FASB not previously posted. The highlights are mine. >&grkral8/18/2002
207Huey, good point about the amortizing of the options expenses over the vesting pTed The Technician8/17/2002
206<i>About this dividend issue....</i> Very interesting commentary. hueyone8/17/2002
205About this dividend issue, a very good commentary in WSJ. Reproduced as is withojt1018/17/2002
204hueyone, I am totally with you on this expensing issue. IMO, as you also suggestjt1018/17/2002
203Hi jt: I believe those articles from WSJ and NYT that you and I posted regardinhueyone8/17/2002
202Ted, that would be "2%-3% of" outstanding shares IMO. Ronrkral8/16/2002
201Ron, clarification regarding certain of my questions... "Isn't the valTed The Technician8/16/2002
200Huey, I agree with your view of how the lack of clarity impacts the stock pricesTed The Technician8/16/2002
199Ted, my opinions on a few of your questions .. <i>"If options are exrkral8/16/2002
198<i>It will be more difficult to do quarter-to-quarter comparisons with prihueyone8/16/2002
197Hi Ted: You have raised a lot of good questions. Here is how I tend to look athueyone8/16/2002
196>> SFAS 123 does not allow any adjustments to the original calculation to Ted The Technician8/16/2002
195Ron, thanks for the thread. Options have been on my mind for quite a while. YoTed The Technician8/16/2002
194Exacctnt, adding grant price and fair value price .. <i>The problem with rkral8/16/2002
193hueyone, I agree totally with your views on FASB/Pitt. In the mean time, all comjt1018/16/2002
192<<<So before-tax option expenses were nearly 60% of sales. That's tExacctnt8/15/2002
191Ted, welcome to the ESO thread ... Here's some FY2001 numbers (in thousandsrkral8/15/2002
190Huey, your footprints led me here. I'm a believer that option grants shouldTed The Technician8/15/2002
189Thanks jt: It is definitely unfortunate that the disclosures will be in the foohueyone8/15/2002
188This article is similar in content to the WSJ article posted by hueyone nytimejt1018/15/2002
187jt101, IMHO there is no correlation between today's market move and the FASBrkral8/14/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News