SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Formerly About SanDisk
An SI Board Since August 2009
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1161 8 0 SNDK
Emcee:  sylvester80 Type:  Moderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromPosted
211Just because the royalty rate for Samsung was lowered by about one half doesnArt Bechhoefer10/30/2009
210Thanks for the detail message. Except that SNDK's IP is worth half as much asylvester8010/30/2009
209Latest Amazon price on the Kingston SSDNow V-Series 64 GB SATA2 2.5-Inch Solid SNHP10/30/2009
208October 29, 2009 (FinancialWire) (Investrend Research Syndicate) — ValuEngine, INHP10/30/2009
207You ask what is SNDK really worth? When Samsung offered $26, the book value of SArt Bechhoefer10/30/2009
206Question to the board. If Samsung's bean counters sat down and calculated thsylvester8010/30/2009
205STEC on fire today and closed above the 200 EMA break. So it could run to $25 besylvester8010/29/2009
204Glad I moved some SNDK money over to STEC... the market is rocketing today and Ssylvester8010/29/2009
203Some technicals on STEC... it needs to take out the 200 EMA which sits around 22sylvester8010/29/2009
202At their current $1 billion valuation with $500 million next year projected salesylvester8010/29/2009
201Eventually, they will probably be taken over. Perhaps by Samsung. In the past, SSam10/29/2009
200For all those reasons you mention (some good ones indeed), they may also be a chsylvester8010/29/2009
199<i>Based on my analysis, and as long as those estimated numbers hold, STECSam10/29/2009
198STEC has no competition at this time. Maybe 2 years down the road when the SSD msylvester8010/29/2009
197What worries me about STEC is the cost of its NAND flash components, which it muArt Bechhoefer10/29/2009
196I should also add that in this market, any miss or lowering guidance will slaughsylvester8010/29/2009
195STEC is in a high growth market. A pure play on the SSD market. One that's jsylvester8010/29/2009
194But STEC is 4 times revenue and SNDK is 1.6 times, so I think your playing the tMad210/28/2009
193That's probably true. Especially for Goldman. Freaking crooks they are. BTW,sylvester8010/28/2009
192To Goldman, everyone except for their own traders and favored clients is a "Sam10/28/2009
191Well... at 4x volume, I'd say someone was the sucker... cause they could havsylvester8010/28/2009
190Actually, IMHO, you've got it wrong. The suckers are the ones who will sell Sam10/28/2009
189SNDK is now below where it was before the 10% run on Monday... unbelievable manisylvester8010/28/2009
188Goldman Sachs Downgrades Sandisk from Buy to Neutral. streetinsider.com Octobesylvester8010/28/2009
187We gave back all the gains from yesterday. 4x volume yesterday and only half thasylvester8010/27/2009
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):