SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
T/FIF, a New Plateau
An SI Board Since February 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
2243 64 0
Emcee:  scaram(o)uche Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2118>>SPPI - Spectrum Pharmaceuticals>> [And now we know a little bit mIcebrg-6/11/2003
2117Let's say five.Icebrg-6/10/2003
2116er..... excuse me. About a three-bagger to mission complete? :-)scaram(o)uche-6/10/2003
2115>> and a YTD-percentage of + 318% << That might actually be somewhaIcebrg-6/10/2003
2114Rick >>So.... does that make your 50-bagger candidate about a 15-bagger tIcebrg-6/10/2003
2113> That's my opinion only, please get your own <whine> But I like yWhatsUpWithThat-6/10/2003
2112>> and a YTD-percentage of + 318% << So.... does that make your scaram(o)uche-6/10/2003
2111>>SPPI - Spectrum Pharmaceuticals>> I wonder if the pump and dump cIcebrg-6/10/2003
2110Chuckle. Burn used to be ENORMOUS. Haven't looked since "VGNX nausea&scaram(o)uche-6/10/2003
2109GNSC - hmm, maybe not, apparently it's being pumped by something called buyhtom pope-6/10/2003
2108How about GNSC? It does not seem to be over followed on SI, still plenty of castom pope-6/10/2003
2107Good job. Took you long enough. ;-)scaram(o)uche-6/10/2003
2106Thanks, VERY MUCH, for the suggestion. Some of the high flyers have corrected Hscaram(o)uche-6/9/2003
2105Yes! A rally, even! Love it. Thanks. (eom)scaram(o)uche-6/9/2003
2104From Yahoo board: a post about illegal shorting. messages.yahoo.comThe Dodgy Ticker-6/9/2003
2103WE Have at it, better a suggestion hammered here and now before looking at anotmopgcw-6/6/2003
2102>>bit too critical << Critical, you are kind. Closer to immature lkeokalani'nui-6/6/2003
2101WE, I think that you are bit too critical on NRGN. We all know that they have tMiljenko Zuanic-6/6/2003
2100nrgn. I recognize I am about to walk squarely into Rick's strike zone with keokalani'nui-6/6/2003
2099Other than KOSN/VPHM which have taken lumps, suggestion: NRGN? $71 million imopgcw-6/5/2003
2098Burned out, heh, I hear that. Starting fresh--clinical diagnostics with proteoMike McFarland-6/5/2003
2097For the thread, Best back at you, Paul! Rickscaram(o)uche-6/5/2003
2096The T/FIF portfolios sort of reflect my personal style. There are many more stoscaram(o)uche-6/5/2003
2095I've been lurking since Nov 99, made and lost two fortunes, am even now subspaul ta-6/5/2003
2094erik, and i thought what you do here is work! thanks. salessoftware salesperson-6/5/2003
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News