SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Netcom
An SI Board Since July 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2601 5 0 NETC
Emcee:  Colin Perry Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2126 Can't stop posting even though I have no more shares. It's like a drugMichael Kim-10/15/1997
2125 Curtis, I dito your ideas on this subject I learnd a good lesson that if you braana mir-10/15/1997
2124 Rich, I have not posted much since the days of the "List" last WinPaul Haynes-10/14/1997
2123 Gonna stay in for a bit. Colin Perry-10/14/1997
2122 Yeah you bring up some good points MK. I still think that $17 trading wasn'Richard Makowiec-10/14/1997
2121 What's the next play guys? My broker sez I have too much cash in my accounMichael Kim-10/14/1997
2120 Rich, I thought about it and thought about it. The upside angle here is limitMichael Kim-10/14/1997
2119 Hey you guys have to check this out. The ICGS homepage has Netcom already in thRichard Makowiec-10/14/1997
2118 Forgot to add. If DG wanted Netcom at $20-22 he could have done it easily with Richard Makowiec-10/14/1997
2117 Guess I'm one of the few playing the bidding war or ICGX trade up angle. ItRichard Makowiec-10/14/1997
2116 Yeah, and did you notice Shel's reaction to "Baghdad by the Bay"?Michael Kim-10/14/1997
2115 Perhaps Shelby might have done better had CNBC not run teasers all morning askiOeconomicus-10/14/1997
2114 I'm out at 20.5 boyz! I feel relieved... L8R, MKMichael Kim-10/14/1997
2113 I'm trying to dump at 20.75 as I write this, don't know if I'll getMichael Kim-10/14/1997
2112 Curtis, the arbs come in after the announcement (unless they follow the teachinOeconomicus-10/14/1997
2111 Rich, can you explain in more detail why you said NETC may trade weaker from hCurtis Gruber-10/14/1997
2110 NETC topping at 21 7/8 almost back to its open now on .5 million shares traded.Curtis Gruber-10/14/1997
2109 Al Gore, but without the charisma. Well, he said nothing that should hurt, but Oeconomicus-10/14/1997
2108 lol...MK..I don't know if you're supposed to make investing decisions bCurtis Gruber-10/14/1997
2107 OK, got up early just to catch the CNBC interview...Bryant may be a good CEO, bMichael Kim-10/14/1997
2106 More bits from Goldman Sachs reiteration (from a fax, so gotta type): <<Michael Kim-10/14/1997
2105 Curtis, Did you make money from this? R Mirraana mir-10/14/1997
2104 no? not yet? ok then how about some more links: <<<* ICG COMMUNICATIOCurtis Gruber-10/13/1997
2103 yes...more links...you can't all leave without more links from Curtis...loCurtis Gruber-10/13/1997
2102 MK, don't be sad. Bookmark each others' profiles and watch for new topiOeconomicus-10/13/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):