SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
ATPG Shareholders
An SI Board Since August 2012
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3620 77 0 ATPG
Emcee:  alertmeipp Type:  Moderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2145Without the 2nd lien (assuming they roll to equity), they should be able to selfalertmeipp111/28/2012
2144All right. Lots of good discussion here and the balance of the evidence favors my12by60211/28/2012
2143I hear you, NOLs value will depend on the profitability of the co on exit. If talertmeipp-11/28/2012
2142Hello Koll, sorry to read that you got flooded out. Not too much damage, I hope.silkscreen12-11/28/2012
2141Just noting ATP's PV-10 doubled or so the last 3-4 yrs purely via price incrsammie44-11/28/2012
2140>>You may not recognize the landscape, though. How true. Need a surprise alertmeipp-11/28/2012
2139Silk - with your knowledge on ATPG, you should be able to tell whether 2nd lien alertmeipp-11/28/2012
2138Welcome back !! You may not recognize the landscape, though.kollmhn-11/28/2012
2137Indeed it was obvious. So obvious, in fact, one wonders what possessed you to wrsilkscreen12-11/28/2012
2136Fine. I suppose they will show it. Maybe the filing spooked me and others and webillgatesisevil-11/28/2012
2135New filings. UCC objects the amendment, looks like they want to see the NASI realertmeipp-11/28/2012
2134To say the obvious, each trade has two side, the buyers buy millions of bond at alertmeipp-11/28/2012
2133Those selling 2nd lien here are saying fraud. Otherwise, no way PV-10 of 4 billialertmeipp-11/28/2012
2132I see what you're saying, now. But, it might not matter much. The DIP amenkollmhn-11/28/2012
2131The conditions of the DIP mod are to liquidate the shore properties first and thbillgatesisevil-11/28/2012
2130I don't think I am misunderstanding where the DIP stands. What I am saying my12by60-11/28/2012
2129Perhaps, you're missing the fact that the DIP has no reason to care about thkollmhn-11/28/2012
2128Forget the guy at First Pacific. How about those that put up the $1.5B for the my12by60-11/28/2012
2127When there is argument over who gets the equity, your statements are often true.billgatesisevil-11/28/2012
2126Wow. This is getting really ugly for all involved here, including me, with a demy12by60211/28/2012
2125took a big hit (lost over 50k) but with all this uncertainty I'm out as welltheguru-11/28/2012
2124Well, Bill, I am sorry for your loss. "Shit Happens"kollmhn-11/28/2012
2123In fairness to Koll, he posted that way back when. billgatesisevil-11/28/2012
2122I am not sure that the filing has sunk in. I am sure it will after tomorrow. billgatesisevil-11/28/2012
2121Yeah, in retrospect, I overstayed. I did sell them in one account, but got back billgatesisevil-11/28/2012
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News