SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
SSA (SSAX) BPCS/Client Server
An SI Board Since October 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
915 6 0 SSAX
Emcee:  Per E Mickols Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
215 Paul, I was thinking the same thing, but Friday's market did not inspire cE. Graphs-8/24/1997
214 So let me get this straight: SSAX tanked on Thursday in reaction to news aboutPacMac-8/24/1997
213 No, I think the majority of the confusion was over an elusive DJ wire that briJames B. Barnes-8/22/1997
212 Bob, Take a look at the evidence here. It looks like SSAX got SYSF news by misE. Graphs-8/22/1997
211 Is it your opinion that the SYSF news releases is part of the bombshell rt thou(Bob) Zumbrunnen-8/22/1997
210 E, I was buying at the open this morning. Hope you had some money available aJames B. Barnes-8/22/1997
209 Well, there you go. SYSF is down big so far today while SSAX looks to be recoveE. Graphs-8/22/1997
208 Appreciate the tip on the SSAX thread, E!...such excitement!..I think I have fiDuane L. Olson-8/22/1997
207 Looks like REUTERS is the big problem here. Enter SSAX symbol get SYSF news....E. Graphs-8/22/1997
206 Dunno on that one. Was thinking I posted about that mixup a while ago. In any(Bob) Zumbrunnen-8/22/1997
205 James, I took it further on PCFN into the related news items, and I think IE. Graphs-8/21/1997
204 E, That is confusing, but not as confusing as this SSAX deal. SSAX did file aJames B. Barnes-8/21/1997
203 Intraday on SSAX: pcfn.comE. Graphs-8/21/1997
202 James, Look at this. Pretty confusing, huh? The first news item is actually thE. Graphs-8/21/1997
201 I can't explain this thing any better than to presume that someone has readJames B. Barnes-8/21/1997
200 I have heard from rt. I'm confused why he wanted to respond to only one ofJames B. Barnes-8/21/1997
199 Bob <I'm in the same boat as you, guy, except that I've got a put prt1^-8/21/1997
198 I'm in the same boat as you, guy, except that I've got a put position i(Bob) Zumbrunnen-8/21/1997
197 Bob, Nope It is a DJ release. it was specific. Listen ppl, I have no ax to grinrt1^-8/21/1997
196 James, I think today was a SNAFU. I think someone misread the news, and that tE. Graphs-8/21/1997
195 You're not referring to the following, are you? It shows up in Yahoo as be(Bob) Zumbrunnen-8/21/1997
194 Jim, <Sorry I don't understand all of your post. This new financing dealrt1^-8/21/1997
193 Tech, Thats not even close to what I read on the DJ news wire. Attempt at Damart1^-8/21/1997
192 Everyone, here's another piece of news(damage control): biz.yahoo.comtech investor-8/21/1997
191 rt, Sorry I don't understand all of your post. This new financing deal isJames B. Barnes-8/21/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):