SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
WTT-Wireless Telecom.
An SI Board Since February 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2426 10 0 WTT
Emcee:  Jerry L. Reger Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2151 My BALL sees it as a "pukey cream". Untouchable-6/18/1998
2150 My TGIF500 still sees WTT as a "Whiter Shade of Pale".<g> JakeStraw-6/18/1998
2149 FWI anyone using TC2000, the BOP turned green on WTT yesterday!Blue_Horseshoe-6/18/1998
2148 By the way, I thought you couldn't short a stock selling for less than 4.13Richard Estes-6/18/1998
2147 It won't bring the shorts back but I think it might bring back some long teNorseman-6/18/1998
2146 If the shorts are out, why would neg numbers not bring them back? steven d. zapf-6/17/1998
2145 I think the shorts are out so I don't think neg. numbers for the 2nd quarteNorseman-6/17/1998
2144 I do agree with you. What I was getting at is that, IMHO, most folks would useJohn Chaffin-6/17/1998
2143 John, I disagree don't believe the 2nd qtr. will make or break WTT. I belieUntouchable-6/16/1998
2142 Richard, I understand what you mean when you say more sells than buys. But withJohn Chaffin-6/16/1998
2141 looking at the time/sales data, I see more more sales than buys. This stock wilRichard Estes-6/16/1998
2140 Too bad the last tick was down. I would of like to have seen +1/8 on this heaEdward Boghosian-6/16/1998
2139 Yes, I agree she could go either way. I plan to hold, mainly because I have no Untouchable-6/16/1998
2138 I'm in at 6+ but IMHO, I wouldn't bet the farm. I'd pass up a couEdward Boghosian-6/16/1998
2137 I mentioned reverse split but I have no information to back this up. Only my Edward Boghosian-6/16/1998
2136 The reverse split was a bad rumor. I am in at 11+ and if had funds available woUntouchable-6/13/1998
2135 i bt this stock at 16.00,sold at 9.00. i have been watching it as of late and munsters-6/13/1998
2134 Hi Sparky, Are you still of the mind that this company is going out of businessNorseman-6/11/1998
2133 Parity plus said the same thing. Remarkable how reliable it is. I recommend it.Sparky Beardslee-6/11/1998
2132 Yes, please don't mention reverse split. I think that is the worst that couUntouchable-6/10/1998
2131 Someone else thinks this stock is going to reverse split? The only difference Edward Boghosian-6/10/1998
2130 The key SENTENCE in the previous press release is: 'We believe their enthusAndrew F-6/10/1998
2129 HOPE THEY SELL THE COMPANY :)) Wireless Telecom GroupINC. E. 64 Midland AvenBlue_Horseshoe-6/10/1998
2128 Excellent! Not a bit o'preachy, RE! Nice, NICE job. See why I reco'd IngotWeTrust-6/9/1998
2127 The oversold condition makes me expect a V shaped turn around to the 3.75 to 4.Richard Estes-6/9/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):