SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
NTN Communications, worth 185 million?
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2985 9 0 NTN
Emcee:  SI (no user) Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2160 That was a new record, I believe! 13 "Clueless's" in one post. dwight vickers-3/23/1998
2159 Sure they were real e-mails, Manson. Interesting I don't see anyone postindwight vickers-3/23/1998
2158 Let "clueless" believe anything he wants if it makes him feel better.JAMES F. CLASPILL III-3/23/1998
2157 Wow, Learnstar is in 10 whole schools and 2 whole states?? Fantastic, after aldwight vickers-3/22/1998
2156 June, June, June, For your reading pleasure. Like I said-----the mistake wasdwight vickers-3/22/1998
2155 Hey Manson! That's great. Making up e-mails. Why do they all sound the sdwight vickers-3/22/1998
2154 Just for information to lurkers. What some think of "Clueless" too!!JAMES F. CLASPILL III-3/22/1998
2153 Sure you do. I am speaking specifically about the instance you are mistaken abdwight vickers-3/22/1998
2152 All opinions are <b>opinions</b>. I make decisions on fact not opinJune-3/22/1998
2151 I will guarantee you that S&P wasn't following NTN. It was an "opdwight vickers-3/22/1998
2150 Dwight, I think you have been misinformed about the S&P Opinion of NTN. YoJune-3/22/1998
2149 Hey Manson! You're not the next mailman we're going to read about in tdwight vickers-3/22/1998
2148 All we get is more BS from "Clueless". But what did you expect??? I hJAMES F. CLASPILL III-3/21/1998
2147 Hope your group sees this, Manson. It's what I mean by analysis. Just getdwight vickers-3/21/1998
2146 My group is growing. Now required to give real names that can be verified. So JAMES F. CLASPILL III-3/21/1998
2145Message 3153997 Have you told your "group" that S&P never did havdwight vickers-3/21/1998
2144Message 3252870 Whoops!!! Just saw the company mention 2700 sites somewhere. dwight vickers-3/21/1998
2143 Here's my response to the Yahoo post. It's very easy to argue the negadwight vickers-3/21/1998
2142 June, Here is a post on YaHoo: messages.yahoo.com@m2.yahoo.com It only goes toJAMES F. CLASPILL III-3/20/1998
2141 Hi June. Like I told my group. This guy is lost. He is clueless. He has postJAMES F. CLASPILL III-3/20/1998
2140 Rich, I would say no way it gets removed unless they're profitable (real wdwight vickers-3/20/1998
2139 Might have been hard to explain to shareholders why he didn't have Learnstadwight vickers-3/20/1998
2138 Any speculation on whether the "going concern" statement will be remoRich Genik-3/20/1998
2137 Learnstar is in pretty good company. biz.yahoo.com "DALLAS--(BUSINESS WIJune-3/20/1998
2136 Dwight, I think I'd echo what's been said on the yahoo board: LearnstaRich Genik-3/20/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News