SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Speedfam [SFAM] Lovers Unite !
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3736 42 0 SFAM
Emcee:  AJ Berger Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2161 I have got to beleive SFAM touched bottom today at 32 1/4 and should continue hJames S. Shaw-11/11/1997
2160 Haven't heard anything. I think we're testing support at around 35. Harry Ehrlich-11/11/1997
2159 No SFAM specific news I know of. In a correction, it seems to me that stocks HB-11/11/1997
2158 This is getting absurb. Merrill Lynch analyst, Tom Kurlak revises estimates foTEColeman-11/11/1997
2157 As always, THANK YOU MR. SAM! Happy investing! THCForYourEyesOnly-11/10/1997
2156 There is a very good reason for SFAM investors to become somewhat familiar withMr. Sam-11/10/1997
2155 <i>If the $35 support fails and we do fall down near the $25 level, then Harry Ehrlich-11/10/1997
2154 OFF TOPIC RE: Cu Dear Mr. Sam, I am interested in SMTL as a play on the use ForYourEyesOnly-11/10/1997
2153 >>Speedfam headed to 25?>> There is some support at $35. The suppMr. Sam-11/9/1997
2152 <<****OFF TOPIC*** Hello Sam Sorry to bother you again!. I have noticed yMr. Sam-11/9/1997
2151 OFF TOPIC (mostly) <<mr.sam.......have you ever looked at Veeco InstrumenMr. Sam-11/9/1997
2150 If SFAM is at 25, they should buy back 4M shares. That is 2M shares for nothinHong Xu-11/7/1997
2149 >>Speedfam headed to 25?>> If it does, they really should repurchaDonald B. Fuller-11/7/1997
2148 Speedfam headed to 25? Is this the next support level and does anyone think iTEColeman-11/7/1997
2147 ****OFF TOPIC*** Hello Sam Sorry to bother you again!. I have noticed you havKalyanaraman-11/7/1997
2146 Chris why did this PHD cite IPEC revenue and not throw out a forcast for CMP? Jay M. Harris-11/5/1997
2145 To All: Here's a RealAudio link to a recent talk by Gordon Moore(of Moore&GuinnessGuy-11/5/1997
2144 TEC, -you wrote- <i>"CAN ANYONE EXPLAIN WHY EVERYONE IN THE SECTOR GuinnessGuy-11/5/1997
2143 Tuesday November 4 11:30 AM EST Company Press Release Semiconductor equipmenTEColeman-11/5/1997
2142 Off topic, I second VECO. I think it has very similar characteristics to SFAM.Donald B. Fuller-11/4/1997
2141 mr.sam.......have you ever looked at Veeco Instruments [ VECO ] ??? it's a ET-11/3/1997
2140 <<And speaking of which...have you contemplated next quarters earnings. ZMr. Sam-11/3/1997
2139 Mr. Sam(sung), Sorry, couldn't resist. It's meant as a complement on TEColeman-11/3/1997
2138 >>Thumbing through Barrons at the newsstand I spotted a positive comment Donald B. Fuller-11/1/1997
2137 Thumbing through Barrons at the newsstand I spotted a positive comment on SFAM.Tomato-11/1/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):