SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Lucent Technologies (LU)
An SI Board Since May 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
21876 377 0 LU
Emcee:  MRE Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
21726I'm long on LU, have been for quite some time, so re your question, I followMark O. Halverson-5/6/2005
2172552 Week Low ... ... of $2.35 back on 4/18/2005. Closed at $2.36. For better orEric L-5/6/2005
21724I saw the downgrade when it was originally issued. I also was watching CNBC todastock bull-4/6/2005
21723Found the following while searching the Internet: On 3/28/05 Prudential FinanciAnonymous-4/5/2005
21722I suspect that the earnings report for Q1 may be less than stellar. Stock Bullstock bull-4/5/2005
21721Well, old LUCY has fallen through the cracks again. Today's close at $2.62 Anonymous-4/5/2005
21720It is a sad day indeed with Lucent drops and Nortel rises.techlvr-3/28/2005
21719WOW! Close at $2.70. That's the support price. Closed at that price back Anonymous-3/28/2005
21718I suspect the performance of a stock after a reverse split will depend on the fistock bull-3/22/2005
21717I cannot recall with any stocks that i have held in the past that a reverse spliSTEVE-3/22/2005
21716Re: <<Enough with the reverse split... It is a neutral event. You can poinstock bull-3/21/2005
21715Enough with the reverse split... It is a neutral event. You can point to all kinDavid Hansen-3/21/2005
21714Well Dude, guess what...your so very right! This is a very good entry point. Butstock bull-3/20/2005
21713dude, I think this bad boy has bottomed ... buy below 3 ...blind-geezer-3/20/2005
21712Hi Anon, I'm sure that the vast majority of share holders have had it with stock bull-3/10/2005
21711<b><i>EASY COME .... EASY GO!</b></i> The last time LucAnonymous-3/9/2005
21710I don't see the Corvis/Broadwing acquisition adding materialy to CSCO whatsoDavid Hansen-2/14/2005
21709David, don't forget Enterasys as a potential acquiree. They still have some DiB-2/10/2005
21708>>>Cisco will do some buying but with someone much smaller. <<<Jeff Jordan-2/8/2005
21707Searched the internet for news on LU. found none!!amoezzi-2/7/2005
21706Huge volume and increasing price in AH - something up?AV8R-2/7/2005
21705Anyone familiar with the LU class action? Is it too late to be included in a serrufff-2/5/2005
21704...a reverse stock split won't help Lucy one bit! Get out now! Same ol'Jeff Jordan-2/5/2005
21703Hi David, Re: <<Credibility is quickly lost but it takes years to regain.stock bull-2/4/2005
21702I just think by some of the metrics I've been looking at that it seems now tDavid Hansen-2/4/2005
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News