SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics
A Neutral Corner
An SI Board Since September 2005
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
2253 11 0
Emcee:  Constant Reader Type:  Moderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2178<i>I seem to be doing a good job of hiding. I can't find myself.</iConstant Reader-7/16/2006
2177Well, sometimes there is no difference. :-)Lazarus_Long-7/16/2006
2176<i>Marriage licenses have always been public record, but until the age of Lazarus_Long-7/16/2006
2175Yes, that's it. Judging only by the page I linked to, I'm inclined to thConstant Reader-7/16/2006
2174Oh, I agree with that. It's the only way some people will believe that otherConstant Reader-7/16/2006
2173A few more thoughts: Marriage licenses have always been public record, but untilConstant Reader-7/16/2006
2172Did I understand this case correctly, Randy? that the pro gay-marriage people deE-7/16/2006
2171No. Although it is arguable that signing a petition to change public law is a pLazarus_Long-7/16/2006
2170Are you saying that you equate affixing your signature to a petition with obtainConstant Reader-7/16/2006
2169That's what I mean. Definitely intimidation and intimidation that can work. Constant Reader-7/16/2006
2168Whenever the subject of the <i>responsibility of the press</i> comesConstant Reader-7/16/2006
2167I'm just fine! And how are you? I had to read that over and over to get theE-7/16/2006
2166And all these years I thought marriage licenses were public record. If an emploLazarus_Long-7/16/2006
2165Yes! And thanks - that was the phrase I was fumbling for and couldn't quite Constant Reader-7/16/2006
2164If I understood that, it gives new meaning to the term "chilling effect.&quE-7/16/2006
2163<b>Iraq’s salvation lies in letting it break apart</b> <i> So Constant Reader-7/16/2006
2162<b>Politics in America Reaches a New Low</b> Whenever one thinks poConstant Reader-7/16/2006
2161Interesting data.Peter Dierks-7/10/2006
2160That post was removed at my request. The matter is closed. No reply was receivedConstant Reader-7/9/2006
2159For the Record. At the time that I posted this message: Message 22607273 six iConstant Reader-7/9/2006
2158Personally I wouldn't invest a dime in a place under sea-level, under-river Brumar89-3/13/2006
2157I dunno about scientists. These are the guys who say things like "toxic soIlaine-3/13/2006
2156<b>... dozens of miles of similar flood walls that were weakened but not bBrumar89-3/11/2006
2155"he perished when part of the scaffolding he was standing on during a publiPeter Dierks-3/3/2006
2154It sure would be nice to think so...We'll see. If he does, geography and hiKLP-3/2/2006
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News