SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Oak Technology (OAKT)
An SI Board Since September 1995
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
4335 22 0 OAKT
Emcee:  Clam Clam Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2185 <Maybe the institutions and other heavy hitters who follow OAKT "learneJack Whitley-1/22/1997
2184 Michael, I agree. This is the most bizzare stock I have ever owned. We were Fred Fahmy-1/22/1997
2183 Fred, this company just continues to mystify me. Have you ever seen anything ligreenspirit-1/22/1997
2182 Daniel, Excellent notes and quite useful. IMO, OAKT has more of a chance of dFred Fahmy-1/22/1997
2181 Well, I don't know what's most useful, but here's my attempted repoDaniel-1/22/1997
2180 This morning, the bid price start at $19 and ask price start at $16. Then ask ishaanxi-1/22/1997
2179 Everyone seems suprised that OAKT isn't going up. But, this is to be expeClarksterh-1/22/1997
2178 Maybe the institutions and other heavy hitters who follow OAKT "learned&quTom Taylor-1/22/1997
2177 Hi, I was wondering where you get these types of things. Im so very confused Dwight McSheffrey-1/22/1997
2176 I'll try to post something later tonight. DanielDaniel-1/22/1997
2175 Daniel if you listened to the conference call please give us a summary of imporJames Knight-1/22/1997
2174 Why did Oakt's rally end so abruptly? What is going on? I would think it woJeff Chudyk-1/22/1997
2173 I did. (But keep in mind that I'm a complete amateur at listening to confeDaniel-1/22/1997
2172 If OAKT is not in its bottom, then it is not too far from its bottom. Hold on Acres H-1/22/1997
2171 Are so many people so shortsighted to take profits today? That must be what isTed Sasscer-1/22/1997
2170 Revenue Amount was in line due to lower chip price. Sales were strong. What hapjoshi-1/22/1997
2169 Who knows. But who would have ever guessed that at 10:15 this morning the stocSparky65-1/22/1997
2168 Perhaps the huge dorp insales is the reason this report is not that good - was steve host-1/22/1997
2167 Perhaps OAK's failure to reach $ 18 today has something to do with IBM'Judy Muldawer-1/22/1997
2166 GRRR. Anyone listen to Conf Call???joshi-1/22/1997
2165 Boy, its sure looks like it. INTC all over again. The saga of this stock justSparky65-1/22/1997
2164 Looks like it opened at 15 1/2 by 15 3/4..... Is this going to be another INTC Peter Smith-1/22/1997
2163 To all, From Briefing: Stock Indications: OAKT +5, USRX +3/4, VSIO +1, SNDK +James Tan-1/22/1997
2162 Dan, It seems that you made a good call again. According to "Briefing&quJames Tan-1/22/1997
2161 Now 16 bid by 15 3/4 ask!Peter Smith-1/22/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News