SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Speedfam [SFAM] Lovers Unite !
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3736 42 0 SFAM
Emcee:  AJ Berger Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2186 Let's not forget Lehman has been in on underwriting SFAM's offerings. HHB-11/13/1997
2185 Marty, Thanks for the link. They sure sound positive. Looking at the intradaTEColeman-11/13/1997
2184 Harry, if it hasn't been posted already, Mr. White at Lehman Brothers is inMartin A. Haas, Jr.-11/13/1997
2183 A quick look at the chart: It would seem that the major support was at the 28 Harry Ehrlich-11/13/1997
2182 I think SFAM is getting double hit: 1 for the sector, 2 for its Japanes partnerHarry Ehrlich-11/13/1997
2181 TEC, -you wrote- <i>"Did you mention the idea of SFAM buying back iGuinnessGuy-11/13/1997
2180 >>Mr Sam, I did a quick calc (from last week's Zacks numbers) and alsDonald B. Fuller-11/12/1997
2179 Mr Sam, I did a quick calc (from last week's Zacks numbers) and also came uHarry Ehrlich-11/12/1997
2178 There have been a lot of questions about the debacle today. First the easiest-Mr. Sam-11/12/1997
2177 Craig, Did you mention the idea of SFAM buying back its stock offering? I'TEColeman-11/12/1997
2176 <<Since SFAM's prospects are more tied to the changeover to smaller dSemiBull-11/12/1997
2175 <<"I suppose that those who bought in the 50's (and maybe 40'SemiBull-11/12/1997
2174 Maurice, I just got off of the phone with SFAM and they say that Farley's sGuinnessGuy-11/12/1997
2173 Farley sold 145,000 of 2million shares--I don't think this is reason for drMaurice S. Green-11/12/1997
2172 Mr Sam, I could use some help with the fundamentals. My Zacks info shows a P/EHarry Ehrlich-11/12/1997
2171 Mr Sam, it's hard to believe that I could have bought SFAM at 28 1/2 at theHarry Ehrlich-11/12/1997
2170 So is it time to sell ?! Thanks !Charles Hsiung-11/12/1997
2169 <i>"I suppose that those who bought in the 50's (and maybe 40DD™-11/12/1997
2168 sfam down on insider selling according to my DJ feed. I dont know the amount. mike-11/12/1997
2167 I think you are right.eomSnowman-11/12/1997
2166 These are the actually transactions. Are they buys or sells ?? Looks like sellEdward Leinbach-11/12/1997
2165 It appears that three 100,000 share trades at around 30 occurred around the oneAndy H-11/12/1997
2164 Can't believe it's at 30 and I'm not buying. Mr Sam may have mentiHarry Ehrlich-11/12/1997
2163 Has dipped below 30 today. High volume. Interesting; hope the volume increasHB-11/12/1997
2162 Sector correction and Asian fears aside, let's not forget that we are enterSemiBull-11/11/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):