SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
biotech firesales
An SI Board Since August 2001
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
3661 167 0
Emcee:  dalroi Type:  Moderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2186INCY: Possibilities: Either there is a fundamental change that I am unaware offormer_pgs-11/21/2008
2185Did u say 20? :-(:-) eomdr.praveen-11/21/2008
2184INCY about 18% to around $2. Anyone tempted ?nigel bates-11/21/2008
2183ARTE hasn’t traded yet, but it will probably be down for the count today: silicDewDiligence_on_SI-11/21/2008
2182TARG was less lucky than THRX. Beaten to pulp, $1.40, -82% AP Targanta shares pRockyBalboa-11/20/2008
2181GENT -50% giving up most of its recent gainstnsaf-11/20/2008
2180NRGN down about a quarter. Not followed this for ages, and it's now at abounigel bates-11/19/2008
2179I may be wrong but looking at my trading system, I see only $8 mm of cash with $Robohogs-11/18/2008
2178<i>>Why is this stock trading at .13-.14? Look at this agreement with PDewDiligence_on_SI-11/18/2008
2177<<<Aside to Dew and rkrw. I hear you guys, but a 94% caning implies to rkrw-11/18/2008
2176I was baffled by the sheer volume; of course the additional shares from the F-3 RockyBalboa-11/18/2008
2175I guess it depends on the milestones. The program is preclinical, so certainly tuck-11/18/2008
2174XTLB, Down 94.22%. Why is this stock trading at .13-.14? Look at this agreememanny t-11/18/2008
2173I don't think expectations were high, their last funding was done for a steerkrw-11/18/2008
2172<i>I'm surprised the expectations were so high.</i> They actualDewDiligence_on_SI-11/18/2008
2171I'm surprised the expectations were so high. It was a desperate act to buy tuck-11/18/2008
2170Back then that was correct but it does not account for the newly issued shares.RockyBalboa-11/18/2008
2169XTLB, As of 6/30/08 XTLB shows 2.83 cash per share with a Book Value of .94,permanny t-11/18/2008
2168Yes,l I´ve not seen such a drop either. I bought a few shares at 7c, and waRockyBalboa-11/18/2008
216797% must be a record.rkrw-11/18/2008
2166Total crash in XTLB -97% to $0.06 (was 2.23) . Go figure! Press Release Source: RockyBalboa-11/18/2008
2165nice... sgmo down another 15% to 2.45, eat what you kill, or kill what you canRockyBalboa-11/10/2008
2164I suspect that the corporate culture that caused this PR to be created AND issueIan@SI-11/10/2008
2163SGMO crashes 57% to asking 2.90 on well tolerated, failure: (note that SGMO hadRockyBalboa-11/10/2008
2162DSCO conference call was a bore. Nothing new, but I guess that's good news.fred hayes-11/10/2008
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News