SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics
High Tolerance Plasticity
An SI Board Since February 2001
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
23153 133 0
Emcee:  kodiak_bull Type:  Moderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
21978Suma, although there are cultural differences, usually the side with the most oucnyndwllr-10/23/2004
21977Terrific post Ed. I think what you have stated here is great insightful thinkinSuma-10/23/2004
21976Chuck, re: <i>Suck it up Ed and quit your complaining......an entire admincnyndwllr-10/23/2004
21975Ed....I have to add this for another perspective... Most of your discussions, Chas.-10/23/2004
21974your constant, incessant, blathering diatribe of antiBushisms and articles is juChas.-10/23/2004
21973Chuck, stop lying there with your hands and feet slapping on the floor and be a cnyndwllr-10/23/2004
21972what a crock of shit..... you take the cake Ed, you're just another MichaelChas.-10/23/2004
21971Kodiak, here's a conservative magazine that despises Kerry and yet recommendcnyndwllr-10/22/2004
21970Ed, Most of the arguments about the war in Iraq are based around WMD's. Facchowder-10/22/2004
21969Bruce, these aren't empty posts, take another look and you'll see that acnyndwllr-10/22/2004
21968I said 5 to 3 because race tracks round parimutuel prices down to the nearest 20William JH-10/22/2004
21967I don't want this thread to become like so many others: empty posts and counBruce L-10/22/2004
21966William, If a 1.59 ticket on George-on-Fire returns you 2.59, and you think thikodiak_bull-10/22/2004
21965Yes, if you bet $159 on Bush your return would be $259 or betting 159 to win 100The Ox-10/22/2004
21964Bruce, two things. First, you mistake the principle of leading by <b>your cnyndwllr-10/22/2004
21963Where is Damon Runyon when you need him? If President Bush was a baseball team William JH-10/22/2004
21962Ha, William, I said I had a deprived childhood--did you have to rub more salt inkodiak_bull-10/22/2004
21961My Brother: You write that the history that I related did not lead you to the mBruce L-10/22/2004
21960Hi KB, You seem to be counting the return of the wager as a win. If one bet $1William JH-10/22/2004
21959Hi Bruce. First, the obvious; our presence in Iraq clearly has something to docnyndwllr-10/22/2004
21958William, I'm not familiar with the numerics in the system you quoted (I ledkodiak_bull-10/22/2004
21957Hi Brother: I've read this Washington Post article and while it is interestBruce L-10/22/2004
21956Bruce, you've written a terrific post that reads like a novel. In spite of tcnyndwllr-10/22/2004
21955President Bush is now -159 at one big offshore book. Two days ago it was -149. William JH-10/22/2004
21954Kodiak, Bruce, Dabum, JimP and others. I am posting a url to an article that procnyndwllr-10/22/2004
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News