SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
NANO
An SI Board Since February 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2272 39 0 NANO
Emcee:  Norrin Radd Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2222Does anyone have any opinions about NANO with the current price of $7.30? Have tNumberspro-7/28/2003
2221Runomo, at these levels, I can't see much downside for the likes of NANO. IELH1006-4/11/2003
2220Eric, I agree with everything you say relative to NANO. I do not follow INTT buELH1006-4/11/2003
2219Hi Chris, Eddie, and Eric.... Great to see all and thanks for the posts. I hopeRunomo™-4/10/2003
2218Hi guys........I'm the "friend" from the Yahoo INTT board Chris spEACarl-4/10/2003
2217Christopher, I have been holding a few thousand shares since last fall and belieELH1006-4/10/2003
2216Hi guys, just thought I would help keep this thread alive. I was a NANO shareholChristopher Brainard-4/9/2003
2215Hi Geoffrey... I agree that we as investors do not have either certainty or claRunomo™-2/24/2003
2214Nice to see a post about forgotten NANO. If one could be certain that the chip geoffrey Wren-2/24/2003
2213Unless the market is discounting a nuclear winter scenario, it seems to me that Runomo™-2/22/2003
2212I think you are right that many small companies may be in play now to potentiallNorrin Radd-10/12/2002
2211Wouldn't takeover of NANO have to be friendly? Such a small cap, you try togeoffrey Wren-9/30/2002
2210My career has been in technology but I am fairly ignorant of the details of the Kevyn Collins-Thompson-9/30/2002
2209Looks real cheap here. My only concern is AMAT getting in the biz (unless they Pink Minion-9/27/2002
2208Geoffrey, I am getting ready to load up on Nano. With 11.9 million shares outstaELH1006-9/26/2002
2207Wish there was more of a NANO following to discuss the fierce drop in the pricingeoffrey Wren-9/25/2002
2206Well, on semi mfg. (not the equipment stocks) in general, there have been some hNorrin Radd-9/19/2002
2205Down about 6% today, to 3.80 or so. Are prospects for semis and NANO in particuKevyn Collins-Thompson-9/18/2002
2204NANO NANO nanoinvestornews.com BorealisA. Borealis-9/11/2002
2203Don't know about LU, but I added more NANO today, fwiw... MoRunomo™-8/15/2002
2202To buy or not to buy NANO...right now??? Nevertheless, looks like NANO can buy Wade-8/15/2002
2201The book value is still very attractive, but I am looking for the real bottom whWade-8/5/2002
2200Hi Wade... Another 52 week low on little nano today. Count me in as of today. IRunomo™-8/5/2002
2199Still waiting to pull the trigger.Wade-7/10/2002
2198Folks, Are you ready to play the next round? I am trying to fish the bottom agaiWade-1/1/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News