SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Platinum Technology
An SI Board Since September 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
4148 8 0 PLAT
Emcee:  Dharmesh Vyas Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2223 Just read the full press wire story. The CFO said that the "... onetime chstockbug-7/22/1997
2222 Richard!!! Get a grip!! REAL institutions don't make up their minds aboutJanice Shell-7/22/1997
2221 Was out to dinner with friends who find this stuff incredibly boring. Missed EVJanice Shell-7/22/1997
2220 Remember if the charges are 57 million that will put back another 17 million tostockbug-7/22/1997
2219 Hope you are right....I am close to 6,000 shares into this one... R/Richard Jurek-7/22/1997
2218 The aquiring charges are not new ones they appear to be acquition charges that stockbug-7/22/1997
2217 Yep. You are right. And the 57 mil is much higher than the original $40 to $45 Richard Jurek-7/22/1997
2216 Hmm from the Statement of operations, the charges came from: Cost and expenseConor P. Cahill-7/22/1997
2215 Looks like the institutions are also seeing the larger than expected charges asRichard Jurek-7/22/1997
2214 Well, it looks like at least some people didn't like it (although, I never Conor P. Cahill-7/22/1997
2213 Just noticed that too. That is a nasty suprise in the sense that we thought thRichard Jurek-7/22/1997
2212 Wrong. They announced very clearly a charge "of around" $40 mil with Richard Jurek-7/22/1997
2211 Another item I noticed the other 39 million includes the aquired in process tecstockbug-7/22/1997
2210 If my memory serves me correctly they said the restructuring would bring about stockbug-7/22/1997
2209 Thoughts...anyone?!?!?!Richard Jurek-7/22/1997
2208 Downside: charges were a full $40 mil more than expected. $40 mil. How do you mRichard Jurek-7/22/1997
2207 PLATINUM technology, inc. Reports Second Quarter Results; Exceeds AnRichard Jurek-7/22/1997
2206 All: Reuters is reporting .06c EPS profit before charges versus a .10 a share lRichard Jurek-7/22/1997
2205 David -- with pleasure. Have a good flight. R.Richard Jurek-7/22/1997
2204 Running to the airport now, so good luck. Richard, could you email me the annodavid decamp-7/22/1997
2203 Saw a nice 20K and a nice 12K buy at 3:10. Some earnings blip players at the enRichard Jurek-7/22/1997
2202 Guess Uncle Alan is behaving himself at Humphrey Hawkins... Everything is goindavid decamp-7/22/1997
2201 All; CHRZ reported less than stellar numbers. Met expectations, and that was aTEDennis-7/22/1997
2200 cp - Yes I have been in and out of FLAT several times... Over the last severaldavid decamp-7/22/1997
2199 Ted... <What does that say for the average investor's opinion of analysBob Trocchi-7/22/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):