SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
Organogenesis ORG
An SI Board Since October 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1223 7 0 ORG
Emcee:  Rick Strange Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
223 <<The number I have seen is that Novartis has agreed to buy ORG, pending T. Mann-9/21/1997
222 The short interest is more good news. I see that the short interest as of 9/15/Paul Shield-9/21/1997
221 Good News: biz.yahoo.comRusti H-9/19/1997
220 Steve: I agree. At this point I'd expect some profit taking. After all, John Curtis-9/18/1997
219 The short squeeze is about over. I'd get ready to short soon myself. Not beSteve Childs-9/18/1997
218 As Sturza has been saying all along, $3 here we come. Wait a sec. I think he Robert Florin-9/18/1997
217 Something is powering this hugh move upward. A buyout is a good one. If I waJohn Curtis-9/17/1997
216 DAMN!! This isn't a short squeeze, it's a Sunami wave, $28 1/4, up $3!John Curtis-9/17/1997
215 Correction-28 15/16 I think only one thing could be responsible for this kind nonzeroa-9/17/1997
214 28 3/4 WHAT IS GOING ON??????????? I bought this stock a while back at 17. Too A. E.-9/17/1997
213 Not that I want to appear gleeful......$26 1/2!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Can we say short sJohn Curtis-9/17/1997
212 I just received the October issue of Scientific American entitled The Future ofJohn Curtis-9/17/1997
211 on this stock you are right - he has it wrong - that is what i was trying to saalan-9/15/1997
210 Poison this threat? Your attitude toward shorts, while not uncommon, is misguidPhil Forbes-9/14/1997
209 John, I would be intersted in the Forbes article you mentioned. Can you give mePhil Forbes-9/14/1997
208 Jack: Thanks for the ONXX info. I'll look into them. As for Sturza; wellJohn Curtis-9/13/1997
207 RG, Rumor had it that ORG might have been on the block for Novartis, which appMarshall Teitelbaum-9/13/1997
206 Sturza's bashing has not materially affected the stock price recently becaurgerson-9/12/1997
205 My recollection is that Sturza has been bashing ORG for years. So far the markeSteve Childs-9/12/1997
204 i have alot of respect for sturza's work but the market will be weighing stalan-9/12/1997
203 I respect your insights on a number of threads John, but just FYI note that ( fJack Phillips-9/12/1997
202 Alan, It has been 23 months since ORG filed their PMA. I have tried to establRick Strange-9/10/1997
201 The FDA has had two primary issues with the filing. First, the FDA has requestealan-9/10/1997
200 Me thinks someone must know something. 21 7/8; up $1!!!! In the last 3 days itJohn Curtis-9/10/1997
199 I spoke with a surgeon at one of the burn units in Philadelphia. They were an rgerson-9/6/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):