SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
Business Wire Falls for April Fools Prank, Sues FBNers
An SI Board Since April 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
3795 39 0
Emcee:  EL KABONG!!! Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2245 What does <i>defecation</i> have to do with this case? Ooops! RhetRazorbak-5/6/1999
2244 <i>This one is particularly good...</i> If there are any attorneysLevel Head-5/6/1999
2243 Buddy of mine just tipped me on this. It's real. mediaring.comDon Pueblo-5/6/1999
2242 ROFLMAO! I'm crying, again. You're killing me! <ggg>Razorbak-5/6/1999
2241 Depends on the particular species of flies. Time flies like an arrow. Fruit fliBill Ulrich-5/6/1999
2240 Spew! You owe me a new keyboard. Tom Swift-5/6/1999
2239 LoL!!! That was H I L A R I O U S ! (Antonio Banderas, indeed!) ;-) But will weBill Ulrich-5/6/1999
2238 So, can I use this CindyLogic™ technique for other applications? For instancTom Swift-5/6/1999
2237 It would appear from this news item that you have all underestimated Cindy'Hoatzin-5/6/1999
2236 <b>Si!</b>—but it's still Webnode's fault anyway— no matterBill Ulrich-5/6/1999
2235 Cindy uses <I><B>Cindy Logic™</I></B>. Hmm, did I justTom Swift-5/6/1999
2234 >>>>>What's this thread all about?<<<<< Umm Ilaine-5/6/1999
2233 LOL! You are really a master. I am not worthy.<g> Ilaine-5/6/1999
2232 Nah, I don't need the number. Thanks. I could spend the next 15 minutes diDon Pueblo-5/6/1999
2231 No, no, no, no, no. These words can't just be thrown around haphazardly. Ilaine-5/6/1999
2230 #reply-7203571jbIII-5/6/1999
2229 Purely from an academic standpoint—to answer your question (“<i>Would thaBill Ulrich-5/6/1999
2228 That may be actionable <ggg> accountclosed-5/6/1999
2227 Oh, never mind. It's irrelevant. Don Pueblo-5/6/1999
2226 dang - taht happened fast. Jacques Chitte-5/6/1999
2225 Umm…do you mean <i>with</i> or <i>without</i> the [refeBill Ulrich-5/6/1999
2224 Yeah, that was a good movie. Brings up a question. What would happen if someboDon Pueblo-5/6/1999
2223 DAMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN!!!!! Janice Shell-5/6/1999
2222 #reply-8994172 Lee , you there you sensitive guy? <i>quad 2's</i&jbIII-5/6/1999
2221Janice Shell-5/6/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):