NANO | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks
NANO

An SI Board Since February 1996

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
2272	39	0	NANO

Emcee: Norrin Radd	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
2247	ERIC, TWAV has been very good to me. I am of the opinion that TWAV will do much	ELH1006	-	9/23/2003
2246	Hi Eddie, Congratulations! While the market and sector got hit today, TWAV wa	EACarl	-	9/22/2003
2245	GW, we all have our followings and reasons for investing in certain stocks. NAN	ELH1006	-	9/20/2003
2244	How does NVMI compare to NANO ? thanks, wiesia	aniela	-	9/19/2003
2243	Eddie: finance.yahoo.com according to Yahoo, TWAV's tangible net assets ha	geoffrey Wren	-	9/19/2003
2242	Geoffrey, I don't see TWAV heading for bankruptcy in the near future nor do	ELH1006	-	9/19/2003
2241	Twav has some fans, and perhaps some good technology, but is it not one or two q	geoffrey Wren	-	9/18/2003
2240	Runomo, when I view the NANO moves as of late, looks to me that it is just catch	ELH1006	-	9/18/2003
2239	Nothing wrong with booking some profits and congrats for doing just that...I dou	Runomo™	-	9/17/2003
2238	This recent run-up of NANO reminds me of the days before the crash. Lots of new	geoffrey Wren	-	9/17/2003
2237	Hello Eric... Hold on to your hat...we may just do over 2 million shares today.	Runomo™	-	9/17/2003
2236	the NANO rocket lights another stage......... SOLD 30% of my NANO in the $13	EACarl	-	9/17/2003
2235	Hi Eddie and Eric...this was a heck of a week for NANO shareholders for sure...c	Runomo™	-	9/13/2003
2234	Eric, yes NANO was a no brainer at 6. At 2 it was like stealing candy from an i	ELH1006	-	9/13/2003
2233	NANO was too cheap - i'm glad the rest of the world finally figured that out	EACarl	-	9/12/2003
2232	Hi Eddie, You're not the only happy one here. ;-) NANO was my biggest posi	EACarl	-	9/12/2003
2231	Runomo and Eric, NANO looks real strong. This little puppy is making me quite h	ELH1006	-	9/12/2003
2230	Hi Eric...a little more color on the new products from Oppenheimer today: -- F	Runomo™	-	9/11/2003
2229	Another upgrade! :-) 3:29PM Nanometrics tgt raised to $21 from $14 at Oppenheim	EACarl	-	9/11/2003
2228	Hi guys, "Integrated metrology market to double by 2005" siliconstrat	EACarl	-	9/10/2003
2227	Eddie, I am not 100% sure but I'd imagine that KLAC would be one.....others	Runomo™	-	9/10/2003
2226	Runomo, do you know who the other three are? Re: optical CD technology is bein	ELH1006	-	9/10/2003
2225	Upgrade from Needham : "Nanometrics upgraded at Needham (NANO) 8.90 +0.39:	Runomo™	-	9/9/2003
2224	NANO mentioned in story about potential AMAT acquisitions on Sunday.......... b	EACarl	-	8/25/2003
2223	Numberspro, NANO is a great little company IMO. Great balance sheet and well ma	ELH1006	-	7/29/2003

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):