SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Vari-L (VARL)
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2702 34 0 VARLE
Emcee:  JakeStraw Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2252 Nicely said.RobertSheldon-5/17/2000
2251 *Thx, but FWIW, some people may take your comment differently,* That, of coursRobertSheldon-5/17/2000
2250 Hi Dave - I hope so too, but it is guarded optimism. VARL is in a good sector, Bosco-5/17/2000
2249 Thanks Bosco, I should have indicated restatement not irregularities in accountuel_Dave-5/17/2000
2248 Hi Dave - while you are addressing Jeff [if memory serves, he was a LT investorBosco-5/17/2000
2247 Jeffrey, Thanks for sharing your thoughts on exiting VARL. When would you re: uel_Dave-5/17/2000
2246 Jeffrey, I cut mine loose today, too. KentKent Rattey-5/17/2000
2245 Robert-Your wish is granted. Hope you enjoy my shares I had enough! I can make FIFO_kid2-5/17/2000
2244 Thx, but FWIW, some people may take your comment differently, Message 13719163Bosco-5/17/2000
2243 I was replying to a post by Lab. on this (VARL) thread.RobertSheldon-5/17/2000
2242 Hi Robert - I hope you are referring to CCR [no position] CCR is a value stock,Bosco-5/17/2000
2241 *It doesn't look like junk anymore.* I was referring to your cruddy comparRobertSheldon-5/17/2000
2240 *CCR had a front page article in the American Banker yesterday stating that theRobertSheldon-5/17/2000
2239 John, The comparison used in post #2204 is still ridiculous regardless of the tayspop729-5/17/2000
2238 Hope you guys followed up on this one. Earnings <i> and earnings per fullLabrador-5/17/2000
2237 It doesn't look like junk anymore. To: John J. Riley who wrote (2204) FromJohn J. Riley-5/17/2000
2236 >>If VARL wants to play the big boy game, be a big boy :)<<Amen....John J. Riley-5/17/2000
2235 Hi John - I wouldn't go that far. Thus far, I think VARL is still very muchBosco-5/17/2000
2234 Too bad that they're using their current accounting firm to perform the stuLabrador-5/17/2000
2233 Speaking of dilution- anyone notice how complicated this appears to be: looks lMadharry-5/17/2000
2232 "In connection therewith, the independent accounting firm is evaluating thJ Stone-5/17/2000
2231 From InsiderTrader, Scudder Kemper and Dimensional Fund Advisors both decreasedpat mudge-5/17/2000
2230 Bosco, yes we are basically on the same wavelength. Dilution now will now takeJohn J. Riley-5/17/2000
2229 Re: "This is a long term situation..." It looks to me like that timLBstocks-5/17/2000
2228 Hi John - you and I are in the same boat, but I am a little bit more forgiving,Bosco-5/17/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News