SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
Politics for Morons – Thread Moron Political Annex
An SI Board Since May 2005
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
326 10 0
Emcee:  Tom C Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
226It is sad when we have to place guards outside our stables, not against rustlersone_less-6/25/2005
225I think this one's worthy of nomination. What say you? Message 21449234 ;-Oeconomicus-6/24/2005
224Not to worry. LnS has assured me on several occasions that his mission is one ofone_less-6/24/2005
223loljlallen-6/24/2005
222No. My moron-hunting boots are more comfortable (I even wear them to catch grubsOeconomicus-6/24/2005
221You have your stalking shoes on today?longnshort-6/24/2005
220Gosh, aren't you a font of interesting factoids.Oeconomicus-6/24/2005
219HEART OF DARKNESS “I fear that a demon has possessed him.” It’s time I sharelongnshort-6/24/2005
218I ran across this on the Foriegn Affairs thread and it made me think of you and one_less-6/24/2005
217The morning, for you, is a time for reflection, is it not?Oeconomicus-6/24/2005
216idiot comes to mindlongnshort-6/24/2005
215If I told you I had read it, would that make me a terrorist?Oeconomicus-6/24/2005
214Gosh, did you drop your Koran in the toilet?longnshort-6/24/2005
213You've already informed us, and much of the rest of SI, about the decapitatiOeconomicus-6/24/2005
212Check this out: DECAPITATION FOR DUMMIES US Marines have found manuals on takilongnshort-6/24/2005
211On a gut level, I'd agree. However, I'd note that the bill of rights wasOeconomicus-6/23/2005
210I assume you are referring to the Supreme Court ruling. I don't know enough Tom C-6/23/2005
209Did you mean to post that on another thread or are you asking for help in findinOeconomicus-6/23/2005
208Amendment V No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamlongnshort-6/23/2005
207No. You?Oeconomicus-6/23/2005
206Are you stalking ??longnshort-6/23/2005
205Are you spamming? Oh, OK. Only two threads. But I'm still wondering what &qOeconomicus-6/23/2005
204wonder if they got Allahlalas blessing on this IRAQ: KIDNAP AND DECAPITATION Mlongnshort-6/23/2005
203LOL!!!! I am definitely going to refrain from suggesting such a thing. :-)Lazarus_Long-6/22/2005
202<i>You may have nominated Tom C. I think that gets you automatic entry. :-Tom C-6/22/2005
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):