SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
MTIC - Is this the next EMC?
An SI Board Since May 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3748 35 0 MTIC
Emcee:  David Farnham Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2273 Ride it through the 11's and hope for 10's. In either case, it'll rgmccon-6/2/1998
2272 Much like my long irons, this stock has gone into the woods. I'd set that Mark T. Heath-6/1/1998
2271 Not only the techs, but the small caps too!!! It's fugly out there! This tBostonView-6/1/1998
2270 "And not one MTIC put has traded today." This has been the trend witMark T. Heath-6/1/1998
2269 Greg, And not one MTIC put has traded today. Very strange. Speaking of strangemichael piegza-6/1/1998
2268 I think we're shaking out the last of the earnings-related traders. I won&gmccon-6/1/1998
2267 Techs are on the chopping block again today; MTIC is no exception. Mark T. Heath-6/1/1998
2266 Zacks moves their "Z" up from "hold" to "ModBuy".gmccon-5/29/1998
2265 I went to Catholic school. I would never short EMC. :-) gmccon-5/29/1998
2264 You'll be hard-pressed to get any meaningful TA from me, Greg. Generally, BostonView-5/29/1998
2263 Greg, Very Short term TA (3-4 days): 3 day Stochastic RSI shows but one day lCraig DeHaan-5/29/1998
2262 Now that I'm back in this issue, I better hype it again. This is another FYgmccon-5/29/1998
2261 Where's our TA? BostonView, what say you? Finished at the high of the daygmccon-5/29/1998
2260 I guess I'm stupid because I can't figure out why MTIC is suddenly suchMark T. Heath-5/28/1998
2259 Michael, Thanks, I should have read further. Lee Lee-5/28/1998
2258 Michael, I have seen that to be true, but I do not quite get it. Is it becausLee-5/28/1998
2257 Greg, Its real simple. There are two very powerful forces in the markets. One michael piegza-5/28/1998
2256 Might be a bit of a squeeze forming. 300K shares traded and it's up a 1/2. gmccon-5/28/1998
2255 "Learn me", Michael, please. How is it that more shorts jumping on igmccon-5/28/1998
2254 Great news for the longs, An INCREASE in shorts is very bullish.... Regards, michael piegza-5/28/1998
2253 NASDAQ short interest is reported in today's IBD. It shows that MTIC'sMark T. Heath-5/28/1998
2252 If there are only a few institutions invested at this point, any decrease wouldgmccon-5/28/1998
2251 The bulk of that posting is quite positive. But I'm curious, with what litMark T. Heath-5/28/1998
2250 Where have you been? I'm a virtual wizard at storage, KC. What do you want gmccon-5/28/1998
2249 While <i> learn more </i> is the best advice I have heard from you KC-5/28/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):